Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A man who claimed his former supervisor at work repeatedly broke wind at him has lost his multimillion dollar compensation claim for bullying.
David Hingst had demanded his former employer, Construction Engineering, pay him $1.8m (Australian dollars – about £980,000) in damages.
He accused his former supervisor Greg Short of repeatedly breaking wind inside his small, windowless office, which he said amounted to bullying.
But the Court of Appeal in the Australian state of Victoria has dismissed Mr Hingst’s case, and ruled even if his allegations of malicious flatulence were true it would not necessarily mean he had been bullied.
The 56-year-old testified he had moved out of a communal office space at the engineering firm’s building to try to escape Mr Short’s constant farting.
But Mr Short allegedly then began coming into Mr Hingst’s new private office and continued to break wind several times a day.
“He would fart behind me and walk away. He would do this five or six times a day,” Mr Hingst said outside court.
“He thrusted his bum at me while he was at work.”
In retaliation he said he would spray his supervisor with deodorant and call him “Mr Stinky”.
Mr Short told the court he did not remember ever farting inside Mr Hingst’s office, but admitted he could have done it “once or twice”.
The appeal judges found Mr Hingst “put the issue of Mr Short’s flatulence to the forefront” of his bullying case, arguing that “flatulence constituted assaults”.
But the court found Mr Short did not bully or harass his subordinate. Neither had Construction Engineering been negligent, judges ruled.
Mr Hingst claimed his former employer had bullied him by firing him in 2009 but the firm argued his job had been ended because of a downturn in the construction industry.
The former engineer has said he will appeal the judgement in Australia’s High Court.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments