Australian parliament bans team scarves
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Despite the "mate" setback, David Hawker, parliament's speaker, would not tolerate a government backbencher flaunting her team's scarf in session, telling her it was "undignified".
With the country gripped by Australian rules football fever as the season approaches its climax, Trish Draper, the MP for Makin in South Australia, turned up for question time wearing the Adelaide Crows scarf.
Mr Hawker was not amused and told her it violated the dress code. "I remind the member for Makin that it is not expected that she wear that scarf, she might remove it."
The chief opposition whip, Roger Price, questioned whether there may be some leniency in the application of the rules for his home team: "Would it be all right if I wore my Parramatta colours?" His request received a similarly curt response.
The Crows play the West Coast Eagles on Saturday for a place in the Australian Football League grand final against either St Kilda or the Sydney Swans on 24 September.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments