Man who raped 6-year-old brother when he was 11 has conviction quashed
Psychologist found boy's upbringing was 'unsatisfactory' and IQ tests showed his intelligence was abnormally low
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A man who raped his six-year-old brother when was 11 has had his conviction quashed, after the Australian High Court found he could not have understood that his actions were "seriously wrong".
The man, who is only known as RP and from the state of New South Wales, was convicted after raping his younger brother twice in 2005.
But, now aged 22, he has been acquitted by the High Court, according to The Australian. In its judgement, the court noted the perpetrator had a lower IQ than 96% of his peers when tested at the age of 18.
According to the High Court report, when RP was left to babysit his younger siblings a decade ago, he locked the six-year-old in a room and said: "If you wanna come out, you gotta let me do this to ya."
He then smothered the child's mouth and raped him, as the boy cried out "no, no". When the father returned and found them, he warned the six-year-old: "Don't say nothing."
The father left the children alone again just a few weeks later, at which time the older boy exposed his penis to his brother before raping him again on a pile of clothing.
In Australia, children aged from 10 to 14 are presumed to be doli incapax, or incapable of legal wrong. The same defence used to be in force in Britain, but was struck out in 1998.
This right can be over-ruled if a child is believed to understand their conduct is seriously wrong. RP was therefore found guilty a decade ago
But subsequent intelligence tests, and the assessment of a clinical psychologist that the child's upbringing was "fairly unsatisfactory", led the High Court to reverse the earlier judgement.
The judgement read: "I am left... with a reasonable doubt about whether RP understood that the sexual intercourse which he had with his brother was seriously wrong by normal adult standards."
The Independent has contacted the Australian High Court to establish whether the man was still serving a custodial sentence, and if so, whether he has now been released.
Earlier this year, an 11-year-old boy became Britain's youngest convicted rapist after assaulting his sister, aged nine.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments