Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Assisted suicide doctor cleared

Friday 08 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pontiac, Michigan (agencies) - Jack Kevorkian, the leading US advocate of assisted suicide, was yesterday cleared of two charges of helping two chronically ill patients to die.

Dr Kevorkian, 67, a retired pathologist, could have received four years in prison and been fined $2,000 (pounds 1,300) on each count had he been convicted of violating Michigan's now-expired law against assisting in a suicide. It was his second acquittal in two years.

The patients, one of whom had Lou Gehrig's disease and the other bone cancer, died by breathing carbon monoxide through a mask in a suburban Detroit apartment rented by Dr Kevorkian. The verdict came two days after a ruling by a US federal appeal court declaring a constitutional right to die which has divided American doctors and set the scene for a national debate over the issue of assisted suicide.

The decision was a virtual invitation to the Supreme Court to step into an area of medical ethics that pits the sanctity of life against personal freedom of choice, legal experts said.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco declared on Wednesday that a mentally competent, terminally ill adult "has a strong liberty interest in choosing a dignified and humane death rather than being reduced at the end of his existence to a childlike state of helplessness, diapered, sedated, incompetent".

The ruling, in a case involving three terminally ill patients, all of whom have since died, applies to nine western states from California to Alaska.

The court overturned local statutes banning assisted suicide and said doctors, pharmacists and family members who helped a patient to an early death were not to be prosecuted. Though polls suggest most US doctors favour legalising assisted suicide, the American Medical Association attacked the ruling, as did some churches. Right-to-life groups raised the spectre of bungled mercy killings and of people pushed into choosing death by the pressure of medical bills or impatient family members.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in