Sri Lanka elections: The 'traitor' standing between President Rajapaksa and an unprecedented third term
Momentum is building behind surprise challenger and former Health Minister Maithripala Sirisena
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Over a dinner of rice-flour pancakes with his trusted Health Minister one evening in November, Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa observed with a grin that there would be no serious candidate to challenge him in the coming presidential election.
Little did Mr Rajapaksa know then that the man who would stand in his way of winning an unprecedented third term as President of this Indian Ocean island nation was right beside him.
“When he said that nobody was going to challenge him, I was next to him and felt sorry for him,” Maithripala Sirisena later told a campaign meeting on his decision to turn on the President and run as the opposition’s common candidate in Thursday's poll.
“I came out because I could not stay any more with a leader who had plundered the country, government and national wealth.”
Mr Sirisena was branded a “traitor” by Mr Rajapaksa’s close allies, but he has forged many political alliances and now appears to be within striking distance of unseating a President who, only weeks ago, had looked unassailable.
Since Mr Sirisena’s defection, 25 Rajapaksa loyalists in the 225-seat parliament have followed, unleashing a wave of popular disgust with a leader whose once-extraordinary popularity has withered amid complaints of autocracy, corruption and nepotism.
Victory for Mr Sirisena would put a full stop on a reign that brought brisk economic growth after the end of a 26-year conflict with Tamil Tiger separatists in 2009, deepening ties with China and souring relations with Western nations over allegations of war crimes and rights abuses.
Mr Sirisena has vowed to scrap a $1.5bn deal with China Communications Construction to build a port city and to cancel a casino licence given to the Australian gambling tycoon James Packer’s Crown Resorts.
The 63-year-old politician from the rural heartlands projects himself as a champion of the farming masses, a clean-living figure who has campaigned against smoking and renounces alcohol.
There is no credible and unbiased opinion poll on the election outcome.
Mr Sirisena still represents the country’s Sinhalese Buddhist majority, who account for 70 per cent of its 21 million population. He was acting Defence Minister when the war against the Tamil Tigers reached its bloody climax in 2009. However, his promise to be a new broom has appealed to ethnic Tamils, Muslims and Christians in a country where minorities have felt increasingly marginalised.
He has pledged to deal with war-crimes allegations through an independent mechanism, establish independent commissions to secure the impartiality of the judiciary, police and other public services, and crack down on corruption.
Mr Sirisena was only 16 when he first took on the establishment, joining an anti-government rally organised by a communist party that ended within minutes as police waded in.
He ran for safety through the unfamiliar streets of the capital, Colombo, before taking an overnight train to his village. He was jailed for 15 months in 1971 for alleged involvement in an insurrection led by Marxists, and was arrested eight years later for organising a public protest.
After joining mainstream politics, he was offered the post of prime minister by Mr Rajapaksa’s predecessor but declined it.
Few would have believed that Mr Sirisena would now be so close to toppling a President who had basked in popularity after winning the war and skilfully kept his opponents at bay.
Sarath Fonseka, the general who led the military to victory over the Tigers, was sentenced to prison after challenging Mr Rajapaksa in a 2010 election. A chief justice was impeached after she ruled against a government bill to alleviate poverty.
Mr Rajapaksa has also benefited from the disunity of opposition parties, which are now united behind his rival.
“Today 48 political parties and organisations have united as a common coalition regardless of party policies, ethnicity and religion to defeat Mr Rajapaksa’s corrupt regime,” Mr Sirisena said.
Reuters
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments