Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cabbage wars: South Korean anger after China claims kimchi as its own

China has received ISO certification for pao cai, a pickled vegetable dish that closely resembles South Korea’s kimchi

Shweta Sharma
Tuesday 01 December 2020 10:50 EST
Comments
South Korea’s agricultural ministry refuted the Chinese claims, saying kimchi has ‘nothing to do’ with pao cai
South Korea’s agricultural ministry refuted the Chinese claims, saying kimchi has ‘nothing to do’ with pao cai (REUTERS)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In the latest cultural spat between two Asian neighbours, South Korea and China are feuding over the origins of kimchi – a traditional Korean side dish made of spicy fermented vegetables.

The row comes after Beijing won certification from the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) to protect another fermented cabbage dish – pao cai, a key element of Sichuan cuisine.

The controversy began, however, after Chinese state media outlet Global Times claimed the award was recognition of “an international standard for the kimchi industry led by China”.

South Korea’s agricultural ministry hit back almost immediately with a statement refuting the Chinese claims, saying kimchi has “nothing to do” with pao cai and that the UN agreed upon international standards for kimchi in 2001.

"It is inappropriate to report [the pao cai certification] without differentiating kimchi from pao cai of China's Sichuan," it said.

The officials claims over the respective fermented dishes have in turn triggered a bitter war of words between social media users in South Korea and China, with both accusing each other of stealing their culture.

“I read a media story that China now says kimchi is theirs, and that they are making international standard for it, It’s absurd. I’m worried that they might steal Hanbok and other cultural contents, not just Kimchi,” said Kim Seol-ha, 28 from Seoul, who was reacting to the controversy on Naver.com, a South Korean online platform.

Chinese netizens doubled down on claiming kimchi as their own, however, pointing out that even South Korea imports a lot of the dish from China.  

“Well, if you don’t meet the standard, then you’re not kimchi,” one Chinese user wrote on Weibo, a Twitter-like social media platform.  

Due to the high demand in South Korea, where almost 2 million tonnes of kimchi is consumed every year, a large amount of it is indeed imported from producers in China. Chinese regulations on imports, however, restrict Korea from exporting its kimchi the other way.  

Kimchi is offered on the side of most Korean meals and is considered an essential element when hosting guests for dinner. 

The row over the dish comes hot on the heels of another online clash between the two neighbours. Last month the K-pop phenomenon BTS faced vicious trolling in China over a member’s remarks about the Korean War and their solidarity with the US.  

The band’s leader, who is known as RM, sparked the controversy with a speech as BTS received an award celebrating relations between the US and South Korea, referring to the two nations’ “history of pain”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in