Presidential candidates clash as Sri Lanka prepares to vote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.On the eve of Sri Lanka's hard-fought presidential election, the two main candidates have let fly a further volley of accusations and counter-allegations, with each side claiming the other is planning illegal, unconstitutional moves to seize power.
As up to 250,000 election officials fanned out across the country, supporters of President Mahinda Rajapaksa used the last day before polling begins to allege that his main opponent, General Sarath Fonseka, had 800 army deserters at his disposal to disrupt voting yesterday. General Fonseka, the former army chief who was sidelined by the president, rejected such claims and repeated his own allegation that the government was preparing to try and use troops to hold on to power.
On a day on which campaigning was technically forbidden, foreign minister Rohitha Bogollagama called journalists together to say that polling might not go smoothly. "Our intelligence says between 600 and 800 army deserters headed by a former major general are roaming around to create poll-related problems," he said.
He had called the press conference to rebut allegations made by General Fonseka that the government was planning a "coup d'état of sorts" if the vote went against it.
If it seems that neither side is able to avoid hurling vicious allegations at the other, it may be because so much is at stake in this presidential election, the first national poll since the crushing of Tamil separatist rebels last spring that ended a three-decades-old war.
Whoever wins will relish the potential of a $40bn economy that is likely to grow as investment and tourism soar, and the benefits of peace accumulate. Yet Sri Lanka is a country where the wounds of war have yet to be healed. The largely Tamil areas – even those not controlled by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) – have seen nothing of the development and infrastructure investment that other, largely Sinhala Buddhist, areas have.
Many Tamils remain wary of the government and, as a result, it appears that a considerable number of them may vote for General Fonseka, who over the weekend picked up the backing of former president Chandrika Kumaratunga, a long-time rival of Mr Rajapaksa.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments