Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Our man in Uzbekistan puts Foreign Office on back foot

Danielle Demetriou
Monday 11 October 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Foreign Office said yesterday that it was unable to rule out the possibility that intelligence passed on to the British Government may have come from victims of torture in central Asia.

Craig Murray, Britain's controversial ambassador to Uzbekistan, claimed information extracted from tortured prisoners in the republic had been passed by the CIA to MI6.

Complaining that the practice was morally and legally wrong, Mr Murray also warned officials in London that information gathered in this manner was likely to be unreliable.

His claims were revealed in a confidential Foreign Office report written in July and leaked to the media yesterday.

"We receive intelligence obtained under torture from the Uzbek security services, via the US," he wrote. "We should stop. This is morally, legally and practically wrong."

The Foreign Office denied that Britain had ever used torture to obtain information. But a spokeswoman added: "We recognise there is a need for intelligence on counter-terrorism to protect the safety of British nationals. It would be irresponsible to rule this information out of hand."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in