Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

North Korea admits disabling UN cameras at nuclear reactor

Andrew Gumbel
Sunday 22 December 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

North Korea acknowledged yesterday that it had dismantled UN surveillance equipment from its Yongbyon nuclear reactor.

The move prompted condemnation from governments around the world.

Pyongyang's official news agency confirmed reports from the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, that the North Koreans had broken seals and disabled UN cameras at the nuclear reactor, in what appeared to be a step towards resuming weapons-grade plutonium production at the plant. The head of the IAEA said Pyongyang started disabling the agency's monitoring equipment at five sites on Saturday and took further steps yesterday.

The North Koreans said they had no choice but to fire up the reactor to compensate for the loss of fuel oil imports from the US, Europe, Japan and South Korea.

But many regional analysts said the move was tantamount to blackmail – using the threat of nuclear war to pressure the Americans, in particular, into resuming shipments of oil.

The move was the latest indication that a 1994 agreement – in which North Korea agreed to abandon its nuclear programme and mothball the Yongbyon reactor in exchange for fuel oil shipments – had been broken.

The timing of the gambit, as America prepared to go to war against Iraq, appeared designed to embarrass Washington. In contrast to Iraq, military action against North Korea is generally considered out of the question. Pyongyang has said South Korea would be reduced to a "sea of flames" by nuclear weaponry within minutes of war breaking out.

A leading Democratic senat-or said the threat to America from North Korea's restarting of the plants was far greater than Iraq's weapons programmes. "This is a greater danger immediately to US interests, in my view, than Saddam Hussein is," said Senator Joe Biden, the outgoing chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"If they lift the seals on these canisters [at the plant], they're going to be able to build four to five additional nuclear weapons within months if they begin that reprocessing operation – that's within a year."

Lee Jung Hoon, a professor of international relations at Yonsei University in Seoul, told The Washington Post: "Clearly, this is a fierce game of chicken. We should be very worried about this. We are approaching the worst limits of this situation."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in