Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Most air strike victims were Taliban, says US

Patrick Cockburn
Wednesday 20 May 2009 12:57 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The US military in Afghanistan is mounting a fierce rearguard action to justify its air strikes on villages in which it claims most of the dead were Taliban fighters, contradicting the Afghan government which says most of those killed were women and children.

The growing number of civilians dying as a result of US and Nato bombing is provoking an angry reaction among Afghans and furious protests by the Afghan government against the use of allied airpower against villages. A further eight civilians were killed by air strikes this week according to a statement by the international forces in Afghanistan.

The US military has produced its first detailed account of what happened on 4 May when US aircraft attacked three villages in the Bala Buluk district of Farah province in western Afghanistan. It admits that 20-35 civilians were killed, but claims that 60-65 of the dead were "Taliban extremists". The Afghan government account, based on interviews with surviving family members, is that 93 children, 25 adult women and 22 adult men died.

The story told by the US military spokesman Colonel Greg Julian in Kabul yesterday is specific about its conclusion that most of the dead were Taliban fighters though vague about evidence for this. Colonel Julian said that video cameras on board a B1 bomber showed two groups of people, each numbering about 30, fleeing fighting and taking refuge in houses which were then destroyed by heavy bombs.

Colonel Julian said that the 60 people moving into the houses could not be identified from the video film footage, but "other information which I could release" proved they were members of the Taliban. "These guys are running from the battle area," said Colonel Julian. "The ground commander is talking to the aircraft commander and confirming that these guys are insurgents from the battle area and regrouping." He added that the buildings were so heavily bombed that "there's not going to be much to bury."

Few Afghans are likely to accept the US military explanation of events. Earlier the new US ambassador to Afghanistan General Karl W. Eikenberry was quoted as saying that he doubted the wisdom of dropping 2,000 pound bombs on houses when it was not known who was inside and coalition forces would change their tactics in order to prevent civilian casualties.

Gen Eikenberry's admission that the US did not know who was inside the houses that were demolished contradicts the official story that they were Taliban fleeing a battle. The US military assertion that most of the dead were Taliban appears to rely on the word of the US ground commander who called the strikes in.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in