Kim Jong-il 'opposed succession'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The North Korean leader Kim Jong-il's eldest son has claimed in an interview published yesterday in Japan that his father opposed continuing the family dynasty into a third generation, but ended up naming his youngest son, Kim Jong-un, as heir for the sake of national stability.
Hereditary succession "does not fit with socialism, and my father was against it as well," Kim Jong-nam said in an interview with the Tokyo Shimbun. "My understanding is that [succession] was to stabilise the internal system. An unstable North Korea leads to instability in the region."
Kim Jong-nam is believed to have fallen out of favour after embarrassing the North Korean government in 2001 when he was caught trying to enter Japan on a fake passport, saying he wanted to visit Tokyo Disneyland. He was detained for several days and then deported.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments