Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Islanders evicted by Britain thirty years ago are still living in poverty

Paul Lashmar
Monday 17 July 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The British Government was accused in the High Court yesterday of illegally evicting the native inhabitants of a chain of Indian Ocean islands 30 years ago to make way for an American military base.

The British Government was accused in the High Court yesterday of illegally evicting the native inhabitants of a chain of Indian Ocean islands 30 years ago to make way for an American military base.

Sir Sydney Kentridge QC, appearing for the islanders of the Chagos Archipelago - known as the Ilois - who now want to return home, launched a unprecedented legal challenge to their eviction. "This application for judicial review arises from a very sad and by no means creditable episode in British colonial history." he said. "Many of them still live in poverty, or near poverty."

Sir Sydney told Lord Justice Laws and Mr Justice Gibbs that, between 1967 and 1973, the UK dispossessed the whole population of the Chagos. The islanders say 2,000 people were involved but the British Government says it was half that number.

"It is not in dispute that this was done without the consent of the Ilois, without consultation with the Ilois and without any arrangements for their re-settlement," Sir Sydney said. "They were taken largely to Mauritius, and a few to the Seychelles. When the ships carrying them arrived at Mauritius they were simply dumped on the dockside with no provision made at all for their housing or subsistence.

"It was only some time much later that some financial and other assistance was given by the UK government, and also by the Mauritius government," he said. Mauritius had mass unemployment at the time and the Ilois found themselves "on the fringes of society".

The legal action has been brought in the name of a representative islander, Louis Bancoult, the chairman of the Chagos Refugee Group in Mauritius.

Mr Bancoult was born on Peros Banhas in 1964, when the Chagos were part of the colony of Mauritius, which the British had taken from the French during the Napoleonic wars.

Mr Bancoult and his family went to Mauritius - some 1,200 miles away - in 1967 for medical treatment and were prevented from returning to the islands and had reluctantly remained in Mauritius ever since.

Describing the actions of the British as "discreditable", Sir Sydney said that, by November 1973, the islands had been cleared of their resident population. This was all to enable the Americans to build a military base on the largest island - Diego Garcia.

The Independent revealed at the weekend that the British Government had been paid £5m by the Americans to make the islands available for a base.

Under the agreement, the US insisted that the islands should be removed from the control of Mauritius and brought under direct UK control "to avoid any political difficulties".

The US also required that the permanent population should be removed, first from Diego Garcia to outlying islands and eventually from the whole archipelago.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in