India's gay sex debate confused by lawyer's gaffe
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A sensitive debate over gay sex in India was thrown into farcical confusion yesterday after a government lawyer urged the Supreme Court to ban it – only for the government to contradict him hours later in a statement accepting a recent ruling that made it legal.
Television channels reported that the lawyer may have been confused and read out the wrong statement in front of the Supreme Court, reflecting an old government opinion.
Additional Solicitor General PP Malhotra told the court that "gay sex is highly immoral and against social order and there is high chance of spreading of diseases through such acts".
The Home Ministry quickly said it was not challenging a 2009 Delhi High Court order that struck down a colonial-era law making sex between people of the same gender punishable by up to 10 years in prison. The ministry said it had "not taken any position on homosexuality".
Conservative groups have asked the top court to overturn the lower court's order, and Supreme Court judges are hearing opinions from a range of people – including conservative groups and gay rights activists.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments