Hong Kong protests: Leader offers ‘sincere’ apology but stops short of cancelling China extradition bill
Protest leaders say Ms Lam has failed to meet their full demands, but effective shelving of bill still represents a victory
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hong Kong’s embattled leader Carrie Lam has apologised for trying to force through a bill changing the city’s extradition laws and suggested it will not be revived unless the move gains popular backing.
Giving her first news conference since the crisis deepened dramatically with last Wednesday’s violent clashes between protesters and police, Ms Lam said she had been through a period of “self-reflection” about her own leadership and offered a “sincere and solemn” apology to her people.
But the Beijing-backed chief executive also continued to shrug off calls for her resignation, a key demand from Sunday’s two-million-strong demonstration, saying she wanted to see out the remaining three years of her term in order to win back the public’s trust.
And she also refused to meet protest leaders’ demands for her to apologise for either police brutality or the official designation of Wednesday’s protest as a riot.
The law in question would have loosened Hong Kong’s strict extradition policy, allowing suspects to be sent on a case-by-case basis to many more countries and territories.
This was to include mainland China, and the central government in Beijing had backed the law from the start. Critics feared the new law would be used to abduct dissidents for show trials on the mainland.
Ms Lam had already “suspended” the bill and apologised on Sunday for her handling of the political crisis, which has seen millions take to the streets and running battles between demonstrators and police armed with rubber bullets, tear gas and water cannon.
But on Tuesday she suggested for the first time that the bill was effectively dead. When asked by a journalist if she could be trusted - given the bill was not being formally retracted - she insisted that it would expire in 2020 at the end of the current legislative term.
She said that “in recognition of the anxiety and fears caused by the bill in the last few months, if we don't have confidence from the people we will not proceed with the legislative exercise again”.
"I will not proceed with this legislative exercise if [their] fears and anxieties cannot be adequately addressed," she said.
It may not prove enough to placate protest leaders. Organisers of the Civil Human Rights Front, one of the groups responsible for the previous two Sundays’ marches, said they were unhappy that Ms Lam had failed to meet any of their five demands, which also included the release of dozens of detained protesters.
Nonetheless, the shelving of the bill is a landmark moment for Hong Kong’s democratic protest movement, low on confidence until recently after the failure of the 2014 Umbrella Movement to force any meaningful change.
While Beijing continued on Tuesday to dismiss the protests as “foreign interference” in China’s affairs, and to censor any mention of the mass demonstrations in Chinese media, the protests will be seen as a victory against the perceived encroachment on Hong Kong’s autonomy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments