Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hong Kong swearing-in ceremony descends into protests as officials use occasion to protest Chinese rule

The three officials are among a new generation in the city demanding greater self determination

Venus Wu
Hong Kong
Wednesday 12 October 2016 14:27 EDT
Comments
Scuffles also marred one session of the legislature
Scuffles also marred one session of the legislature (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Three newly elected Hong Kong legislators have used their swearing-in ceremony to raise the contentious issues of independence and more democracy, highlighting growing defiance of Beijing among the city's young activist politicians.

The three are among a new generation in the city, which returned to Chinese rule in 1997, demanding greater self determination, at least six of whom won seats in its 70-member legislature in an election last month.

Two of the new politicians pledged allegiance to a “Hong Kong nation” and displayed a “Hong Kong is not China” banner as they took their oath.

In response to their action, the head of the city's Legislative Council Secretariat said he had no authority to administer the oaths to Yau Wai-ching, 25, and Baggio Leung, 30.

“As a member of the Legislative Council, I shall pay earnest efforts in keeping guard over the interests of the Hong Kong nation,” Mr Leung said, just before he took his oath.

He told Reuters that by the word “nation”, he meant a body of people, not a country.

A third legislator, surveyor Edward Yiu, added a line about fighting for genuine universal suffrage at the end of the official statements. His oath was also not accepted.

Scuffles erupted later when the trio were locked out of a session that voted in a new legislative president.

Mr Leung shouted that legislative staff were shutting him out illegally while, inside the room, guards shielded a senior pro-establishment legislator from angry democrats, some who were tearing up ballot papers.

New president Andrew Leung said he was taking on his speaker's role with a “heavy heart”.

The oath taking is an early test of the new legislators' determination to push independence issues in defiance of Beijing's steadfast opposition to any such suggestion.

Hong Kong's mini-constitution, or Basic Law, drawn up when the former British colony returned to China, does not explicitly forbid discussion of independence and it grants freedom of expression.

But its first article states that Hong Kong is an inalienable part of China.

Legislators must complete the oath, swearing allegiance to the Hong Kong Special Administration of the People's Republic of China, before they can take up their seats.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang declined to comment on what the new legislators said but reiterated Hong Kong's status as part of China.

“Hong Kong is a special administrative region of the People's Republic of China. This is very clear and unquestionable, and will not change,” he told a daily news briefing.

Later, scuffles erupted when the three activist politicians were locked out of a session that voted in a new legislative president.

Mr Leung shouted that staff were shutting him out illegally. Inside, guards shielded a senior pro-establishment legislator from angry democrats, some of whom tore up ballot papers.

Earlier, another source of controversy at the ceremony was that Ms Yau and Mr Leung pronounced “China” as “Chee-na,” which some legislators said sounded like a derogatory term the Japanese used while they occupied China during World War Two.

The two said the supposed pronunciation was merely a quirk of their accents but a pro-establishment politician, Priscilla Leung, said it was “very offensive” and “unacceptable”.

Ms Yau also appeared to utter a profanity while reading “People's Republic of China” in English during the ceremony, but she later denied it.

The global financial hub was promised extensive freedom and a high degree of autonomy under a “one country, two systems” principle when the British handed it back in 1997.

But younger people have grown frustrated at stalled democratic changes, sparking unprecedented calls for various forms of greater autonomy, from self-determination to independence.

Immediately after the election in September, Beijing's main office overseeing the city, the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office, said it “resolutely opposed” any form of independence.

On Wednesday, some other pro-democratic politicians shouted slogans and held up props, including a yellow umbrella, a symbol of 2014 pro-democracy demonstrations, but nevertheless had their oaths administered.

Senior officials and judges have warned privately that they fear Beijing may push legal changes on Hong Kong to effectively outlaw discussions of independence or self determination.

But debate of the issue in the legislature might be unavoidable, a pro-Beijing legislator said.

“We cannot disallow discussion of certain topics that are already widely discussed in society,” said Starry Lee, leader of the largest pro-Beijing political party.

“We should not run away from relatively sensitive issues. But I do not believe radical actions will gain support from most people in the public.”

Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in