Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam cuts ties with Cambridge University college after row over academic freedoms
Wolfson College said it raised concerns with Hong Kong’s chief executive about ‘her commitment to the protection of human rights and the freedom of expression’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam has dropped her honorary fellowship with Cambridge University’s Wolfson College following a row over the state of academic liberties across the semi-autonomous region.
The college said last month that it was considering a proposal to strip Ms Lam of the title after the national security law, which significantly reduces Hong Kong’s independence from Beijing, was passed by the Chinese government in June.
Wolfson College said it had raised concerns with Hong Kong’s leader about “her commitment to the protection of human rights and the freedom of expression”.
On Saturday night, Ms Lam said on her Facebook page that she had written to the college a day earlier to relinquish her fellowship.
The chief executive said the college president had been under pressure from British politicians, the media and other groups since the eruption of anti-government protests in Hong Kong last year.
She claimed to have repeatedly written to the college to clarify the situation and offer “the truth” on Hong Kong.
“The president again wrote to me last week, saying the college believes I have deviated from the principle of academic freedom and freedom of speech, penalised teachers who had criticised the government, banned students from singing and chanting slogans at school and enforced the national security law outside Hong Kong,” Ms Lam wrote.
She described the accusations as “groundless” and said she was “deeply disappointed by the college smearing a person on the basis of hearsay instead of facts”.
Ms Lam also said that professor Jane Clarke, the president of Wolfson College, had failed to present any proof which supported the accusations made against her.
“I cannot persuade myself to continue having any connection with Wolfson College and therefore decided to give back the honorary fellowship,” said Ms Lam, who previously studied at Cambridge University.
A statement from Wolfson College said: “The governing body raised concerns with Mrs Carrie Lam about her commitment to the protection of human rights and the freedom of expression in Hong Kong following recent events there. In response, Mrs Lam has resigned from her honorary fellowship.
“The governing body was due to consider Mrs Lam’s honorary fellowship early next month but will no longer do so.”
Last November, three members of the House of Lords called for the college to cut ties with Ms Lam over her response to months of huge and often violent protests.
The college later expressed open concerns following the enactment of the national security law.
“Wolfson College strongly supports the protection of human rights and the freedom of expression of all its members,” Ms Clarke said in a statement on 1 July.
“Accordingly, it is deeply concerned by recent events in Hong Kong following the enactment of the national security law. The governing body will be considering Mrs Lam’s position as an honorary fellow of the college.”
The legislation has criminalised any act of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign or external forces.
It gives Beijing powers to shape life in Hong Kong it has never had before. Critics say it effectively curtails protest and freedom of speech, while China has said it will return stability.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments