Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Election results released yesterday gave an edge to the pro-China faction in Hong Kong's legislature, where power is split between those aligned with Beijing and those who favour further democratic reforms. The pro-democratic parties, however, retained enough seats to veto any proposed changes to the former British colony's constitution.
Many expected that Hong Kong's broad array of pro-democracy parties would make big gains with support from people increasingly frustrated with the new Beijing-backed leader over a wide range of issues.
But the gains failed to materialise because the pro-democracy camp, which has been divided by feuds and rivalries, failed to mount a unified strategy against their pro-Beijing rivals.
In Sunday's election, 40 of the 70 seats on the Legislative Council, which were decided by voters, were split fairly evenly between the two sides. Pro-democratic candidates won 21 seats – 18 in local districts and three more so-called "super seats" open to nearly all voters city-wide. Pro-Beijing rivals won 19 seats – 17 local and two super seats.
Another 30 seats were chosen by members of business and special interest groups known as "functional constituencies", most of which are dominated by pro-Beijing figures. Pro-democracy candidates won only six of those seats.
Still, pro-democracy candidates retained 27 of the 70 seats, more than the minimum 24 needed for veto power on constitutional issues, the most contentious being the eventual introduction of full democracy.
Beijing has pledged to allow residents to choose their leader by 2017 and all lawmakers by 2020. AP
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments