Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.India's Supreme Court rejected an appeal yesterday to reinstate stronger charges against seven people convicted of negligence over the 1984 toxic gas leak in Bhopal that killed an estimated 15,000 people.
The leak at a Union Carbide plant, the world's worst industrial accident, left thousands more with devastating deformities and other health problems. Survivors say their plight has been long ignored, and nearly three decades later justice has still not been served. In recent years, they have demanded harsher punishments for those responsible, called for the extradition of the former head of Union Carbide from the United States and pushed for far more generous compensation for the victims and their families.
The seven former officials of Union Carbide's Indian subsidiary were initially charged with culpable homicide, but a 1996 Supreme Court ruling reduced the charges. Last year, they were convicted of causing death by negligence and sentenced to two years in prison, That relatively light sentence caused an outcry and the government appealed. The officials, all Indian nationals and many in their 70s, were released on bail.
In rejecting the prosecution's case, the court said the government never explained why it had waited 14 years to try to reinstate the stronger charges to gain longer sentences.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments