Angry Likud has no alternative
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jerusalem - Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader of the opposition Likud party, joined 250 right-wing Israelis last night in signing a pledge declaring the agreement reached in Washington "null and void", writes Patrick Cockburn. It appears, however, from Mr Netanyahu's statements afterwards, that if he wins next year's election he will not abrogate the accord but will expect Yasser Arafat to keep his promises.
There has been little backlash from the right since the agreement on Palestinian self-rule was initialled in Taba last Sunday. This is partly because Likud does not have an alternative policy to peace negotiations. A poll by the daily Yediot Aharanot indicates 51 per cent support them, while 47 per cent are against. Yitzhak Rabin, the Prime Minister, said: "The problem distressing the public is personal security On this will fall or rise the agreement."
The main opposition to the accord has focused less on withdrawal of troops from occupied areas than the freeing of Palestinian prisoners involved directly or indirectly in killing Jews. President Ezer Weizman said he "would not agree to release prisoners who have Jewish blood on their hands". A small number of the 1,300 Palestinians to be released fall into this category.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments