Wyoming introduces wildlife crossings and collisions drop

The engineers were used to building overpasses for vehicles, not wildlife. But every spring and fall, collisions with mule deer and pronghorn spiked in the Pinedale region of Wyoming, where Route 191 disrupted their age-old migration paths. So the state Department of Transportation joined with the state wildlife agency and nonprofit groups to create a series of crossings. Collisions have dropped by roughly 90 per cent.

“It felt like we finally found something that works,” said Jennifer Hoffman, an engineer at the Wyoming Department of Transportation. “People are pretty hesitant to do something new. Once you’ve done it, and it does what you said it would do, they’re willing to do it more.”

Examples like that, along with earlier success stories from Canada and Europe, have led to a broad consensus on the value of animal crossings, according to environmentalists and transportation officials alike.

“This is the time of the wildlife crossing,” said Mike Leahy, director of wildlife, hunting and fishing policy at the National Wildlife Federation. “This issue has been building for decades, and it was like pulling teeth. And now everyone who works on these issues seems to get it.”

Research shows that, across the country, there are 1 to 2 million collisions between vehicles and large animals each year. These accidents cause more than 26,000 human injuries and about 200 human deaths.

Funding for crossings is a challenge, but that may get easier, too: A bipartisan Senate version of the transportation bill being hammered out in Congress includes $350m (£247m) for wildlife crossings and corridors.

States often piggyback wildlife structures or modifications onto other road improvement projects, and they are still experimenting with how to get the best value for the money. In Utah, a team from the state’s Transportation Department was planning a new truck lane on a stretch of highway that was a hot spot for collisions with moose, elk and deer. But given the conditions at their site, they did not have the money to build something as wide as most other overpasses.

So they worked with the budget and topography they had, constructing a wildlife bridge that was remarkably narrow considering how long it was.

The bridge was finished by the time they hired Nicki Frey, a wildlife biologist with Utah State University, to study the effectiveness of the crossing. When she first saw it, she was startled by how skinny and stark it looked. “Oh, my gosh, how is this ever going to work?” she recalled thinking.

“I was really only expecting maybe a handful of successful crossings in the first year,” Ms Frey said. “We expected to see a lot of animals approach the overpass, sort of sniff around, maybe make some anxious looking movements and then decide not to use it.”

But when she reviewed the images from the trail cameras, she was stunned.

A wide variety of animals were using the overpass, often without hesitation. Within the first several months of her study, she documented hundreds of crossings.

There were moose, deer, black bears, mountain lions, porcupines and more.

“They’re actually just using it on a daily basis,” Ms Frey said. “We had coyotes hunting on it. We had bobcats hunting on it. We have marmots that just come and lounge in the sun and then leave. Rabbits and some of the smaller mammals like ground squirrels and chipmunks, they are just coming to forage for seeds and whatnot and then leaving. So it’s not even just, ‘Oh, my gosh, I’ve got to get across the highway.’ It’s just part of their habitat now.”

The one target species that has been almost absent is elk.

“This is only the beginning,” said Matt Howard, a wildlife biologist with the Utah Department of Transportation. “If it’s going to follow the patterns we get from other crossings, it’s going to increase for four or five years, and then it plateaus.”

While transportation officials emphasise that human safety is the main motivation for these new projects, the structures do not come a moment too soon for animals. Development continues to erode wildlife habitat, disrupt migration corridors and fragment groups, leading to population collapse and unhealthy genetic isolation. Looming large is another threat: climate change. As certain species move in search of cooler, moister conditions, they will have to contend with busy roadways.

Animals also have to escape more intense wildfires and find new habitat while the burned areas recover, scientists say.

There are more than 1,000 dedicated wildlife crossings in the United States today, up from just a few in the 1970s and ‘80s, according to Patricia Cramer, an ecologist who has studied and worked in the field for two decades. But only 10 or 20 are overpasses. While overpasses tend to get the most attention, underpasses and tunnels are far more common.

Nationwide, an overpass spanning a four-lane highway typically costs $5 to $10m (£3.5 to £7m); large underpasses are cheaper, starting at a few hundred thousand dollars, according to Marcel Huijser, an ecologist with Montana State University’s Western Transportation Institute.

But building them in appropriate places saves money overall, his research shows. Wildlife collisions cost $8bn (£5.6bn) per year for things like vehicle repair, medical expenses, towing and the removal and disposal of animal carcasses. Thus far, the insurance industry has not helped pay for crossings, something advocates and officials say they hope will change.

Still, the crossings are worthwhile public safety measures, Mr Huijser said. He pointed out that insurance companies are not responsible for fixing other dangerous roadway issues like curves that are too tight.

The costs and visual impact of the related fencing have sometimes provoked pushback from the public, but transportation officials say they have been more surprised by how popular they have been.

At the Flathead Indian Reservation, south of Glacier National Park in Montana, wildlife crossings helped persuade the community to agree to a road-widening project. For years, tourists, truckers and commuters would race down a treacherous section of US Highway 93 with little or no shoulder. The state wanted to widen the highway to four lanes from two and add a turning lane, but the tribes who live there — the Bitterroot Salish, Upper Pend d’Oreille, and the Kootenai — were concerned about how a larger highway would divide their communities and affect wildlife, particularly threatened grizzly bears. They eventually agreed to a project that included 42 wildlife crossings.

“It’s safer for people, and it’s safer for animals,” said Whisper Camel-Means, the tribal wildlife program manager.

Another boost to the popularity of wildlife crossings: trail camera footage going viral. One of the most viewed clips was not even a designated structure — just a culvert under a busy highway in California’s Santa Cruz mountains. A coyote and badger, recorded by scientists studying how animals interact with roadways, looked like friends.

Another clip — of a bobcat kitten and its mother under a bridge along Highway 68 near Salinas, California — was part of a similar study. With substantial private donations, the state is planning an $87m (£61m) crossing for mountain lions that would be the biggest of its kind in the world.

Scientists warn that even as wildlife crossings gain traction, they are only one piece of the work needed to reconnect fragmented populations of wildlife. And the environmental value of crossings will backfire if they are used to get new roads approved in places where the impact to animals is too high.

“I want everyone to be superexcited about wildlife crossings, but I don’t want people to forget that a wildlife crossing is like a Band-Aid,” said Trisha White, an environmentalist who was integral in moving wildlife crossings from the fringes to the mainstream in the United States. The structures, she emphasised, can only fix a small part of the road’s damage to wildlife habitat.

“The road,” she said, “is like a wound.”

The New York Times