Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

World Vision denies claims staff sexually exploited Haiti earthquake survivors

‘World Vision’s extensive investigations into these issues revealed that those involved in sexual exploitation were not World Vision staff,’ says the charity

Maya Oppenheim
Sunday 18 February 2018 09:24 EST
Comments
World Vision is active in more than 90 countries
World Vision is active in more than 90 countries (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Government-funded charity World Vision has denied allegations its staff coerced survivors of Haiti’s catastrophic 2010 earthquake into having sex.

Paid employees of the evangelical Christian humanitarian aid charity were accused of forcing Haitians to have sex or pay for aid in 2010, according to a report in the Mail on Sunday.

But World Vision, where Meghan Markle was a global ambassador from 2016 to 2017, has denied the story and argued it misconstrues the reality of the situation.

“While we know we did not get everything right, the Mail on Sunday story in the UK and Ireland misrepresents our actions and omits key findings from our investigations, which we described publicly, and which were shared with authorities, donors, and the Mail’s journalist, several years ago,” the charity said in a statement.

The children’s charity, which is active in more than 90 countries, admitted investigations it conducted identified issues of sexual exploitation, but found that those involved were not World Vision staff.

“In our cash-for-work programme in 2010-11, several evaluations conducted by World Vision and our partners highlighted a number of issues in government-run camps; of nepotism, sexual exploitation and inaccurate record-keeping,” the charity said.

“World Vision’s extensive investigations into these issues revealed that those involved in sexual exploitation were not World Vision staff. They were community volunteers and cash-for-work beneficiaries themselves.”

World Vision explained it reported those issues to authorities and worked in conjunction with them to provide training and follow-up procedures to curb “these practises”.

“We recognise that it is possible there may have been inappropriate behaviour by people employed by or associated with World Vision that went unreported,” the statement continued. “If that is the case, we encourage anyone who saw or experienced sexual exploitation or abuse to come forward, or to report it through our confidential Whistleblower Hotline, and we will do all we can to investigate.”

World Vision’s response follows the aid worker sex scandal storm that has engulfed Oxfam since the accusation its workers sexually abused children and used prostitutes in Haiti, Southern Sudan and in the Ivory Coast.

Oxfam, one of the world’s biggest disaster relief charities, on Saturday admitted it knew about a Save the Children report from a decade ago which suggested “significant” abuse was being carried out by aid workers from unspecified charities overseas.

The charity, which has agreed to stop bidding for government funding until ministers are content it can meet the “high standards” expected, apologised this week for unspecified sexual misconduct uncovered in a 2011 internal investigation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in