Why Republicans are incandescent over switch to low-energy light bulbs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Republicans in Washington have had a bright idea. A light bulb has illuminated above the party's collective intellect and it's definitely not one of those fluorescent ones friendly to the environment. It's the old energy-guzzling incandescent type.
While wars are fought and unemployment numbers soar, members of the majority in the House of Representatives occupied themselves yesterday with a Bill that aims to reverse legislation promoting low-energy light bulbs that was signed into law in 2007 by then President George Bush.
What seemed like a good idea at the time has all of a sudden become anathema to conservative lawmakers.
Michele Bachmann, the founder of the Tea Party caucus and presidential hopeful, has long railed against the law, calling it government over-reach. She says it is every US citizen's right to buy old-style bulbs that gobble electricity if they wish. Never mind predictions that the law would reduce household energy costs by an average of 7 per cent and save America $12.7 billion (£7.9bn) annually by 2020.
The law introduces new energy standards for the manufacturers of the bulbs. From January the 100-watt fluorescents will no longer be available, but some new kinds of fluorescents will remain on the market as well as an array of new incandescent and LED bulbs that work much more efficiently.
But conservatives are affronted. "This is about more than just energy consumption, it is about personal freedom," said Joe Barton, the Texas Republican behind the repeal effort. "Voters sent us a message... that it is time for politicians and activists in Washington to stop interfering in their lives and manipulating the free market."
If the Republicans are looking retro, recall that the original law was not drawn up by green-hued Democrats but by one of their own. That was Fred Upton of Michigan, who released a statement at the time praising it: "By upgrading to more efficient light bulbs, we will help preserve energy resources and reduce harmful emission [sic], all the while saving American families billions of dollars in their electric bills."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments