White House ordered to halt wire-taps without warrants
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal judge yesterday ordered an immediate end to the Bush administration's practice of eavesdropping without a warrant on the phone calls and emails of US residents suspected of links with al-Qa'ida and other terrorist groups.
District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, of Detroit, ruled that the National Security Agency wiretapping programme, initiated in 2002 in response to the 9/11 attacks and made public by the New York Times last December, represented an abuse of presidential power and violated the privacy and free speech provisions of the US Constitution.
"It was never the intent of the Framers to give the President such unfettered control, particularly where his actions blatantly disregard the parameters clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights," she wrote in a 44-page ruling.
Since the programme came to light, the Bush administration has argued that it was justified in circumventing the courts because of the exigencies of its self-declared war on terror. A law passed by Congress in 1978, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, allows the government to initiate a wiretap without permission in an emergency, but insists that it be ratified by a special judge within 72 hours.
Judge Taylor's ruling was the second major rebuff in a month to the Bush administration's aggressive pursuit of executive power in the war on terror. In July, the Supreme Court decreed that so-called "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo Bay could not be exempted from either the oversight of the US judicial system or the Geneva Conventions.
Unlike the Supreme Court ruling, however, Judge Taylor's decision is still subject to appeal.
The Justice Department responded almost immediately with its intention to pursue the matter higher up the federal court system, saying the programme was "an essential tool for the intelligence community in the war on terror".
The department was also expected to ask to be able to continue its wiretapping practices while the appellate ruling remains pending.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments