When is an iPhone not an Apple iPhone? Technology giant loses trademark in Brazil

Your support helps us to tell the story

Support Now

Find out moreClose

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

When is an iPhone not necessarily an Apple iPhone? When it’s in Brazil, according to the country’s patent authorities, who yesterday ruled that famed trademark does not belong to the Californian company but a local company which filed its request to use the brand years before the Apple device was launched.

The ruling, which only applies in the Brazilian market, doesn't prohibit Apple from selling its smartphones in the country. But the Institute of Industrial Property, the Latin American nation’s patent authority, said the brand belongs to a local business called Gradiente, which began producing its 'iphone' with a lower case ‘p’ last year. It registered the 'iphone' trademark in the country in 2000, seven years before the Apple device was launched.

Gradiente could now go to court to enforce exclusivity, although Apple is reported to be pursuing an appeal. The American technology giant didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment yesterday.

Last year, Apple reached a $60m settlement with a Chinese company called Proview to resolve a dispute over the iPad trademark. Proview claim its local unit owned the now-iconic name in the country, and had applied for customs authorities to block shipments of Apple’s device. The company eventually reached a deal to end the case, which had threatened its business in one of the world’s most lucrative consumer markets.