Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wanted: Investigative reporter keen to attack ex-Scientologists for the Church's in-house magazine

Freedom called a group of leading former members 'a posse of lunatics'

Tim Walker
Wednesday 24 July 2013 18:09 EDT
Comments
'Freedom', the Church of Scientology's in-house magazine
'Freedom', the Church of Scientology's in-house magazine

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jobs in US journalism may be hard to come by these days, but at least one publication is hiring: Freedom, the in-house magazine of the Church of Scientology, is looking for investigative reporters to join its team.

A recent job listing on the website journalismjobs.com says Freedom is seeking “experienced investigative reporters” for assignments in the Los Angeles area. The role is for a freelancer, and the salary is negotiable. Applicants are invited to send their CVs to the editor’s email address. According to the advertisement, “Freedom, published by the Church of Scientology since 1968, covers human rights, social betterment issues and does investigative reporting in the public interest.”

The magazine is perhaps unique in the amount of column inches it uses to attack other journalists, specifically those who have reported negatively on the Church and its activities. The New Yorker magazine’s lengthy profile of filmmaker and former Scientologist Paul Haggis, for example, was described in a Freedom editorial as “a twisted farce told through the eyes of a Felliniesque cast of liars and misfits.”

Another issue of the magazine, from July 2010, was devoted to CNN anchor Anderson Cooper, who several months previously had run a series of reports about the Church, “Scientology: A History of Violence”. Criticising the “positively dishonest” host’s “utter lack of investigatory acumen”, Freedom accused Cooper of airing “salacious, false allegations to try to salvage a program whose ratings have been so anaemic that at times only about a half-million viewers tune in”.

The BBC’s Panorama was denounced for its “desperate lies”, and Freedom also maintains a long-standing feud with the St Petersburg Times – now called the Tampa Bay Times – a newspaper close to the Church’s headquarters in Clearwater, Florida.

The magazine reserves its most damning criticisms, however, for a group of former leading Scientologists who are now its most outspoken critics, including Marty Rathbun, ex-Inspector General of the “Religious Technology Center”, and Mike Rinder, who was once the Church’s chief spokesman. The front page of its website, freedommag.org, is still taken up by a 2011 cover story about this so-called “Posse of Lunatics”, and their “apocryphal tales” about Scientology.

The job opening at Freedom comes little more than a week after it was reported that Leah Remini, star of the sitcom King of Queens, had left the Church and joined Haggis on the list of celebrity Scientology apostates.

In a 2011 interview with the Village Voice, Mike Rinder said he believed the attack on The New Yorker had been orchestrated personally by the Church’s leader, David Miscavige. “I believe it is a measure of the depths of desperation that they have, and Miscavige in particular has, because all he can do is try, through twisting and distorting photographs and distorting facts, to make the people that are exposing him seem like they're unreliable,” Rinder said. “He [Miscavige] won't go out in the media himself and say, ‘No, that's not what happened.’ He won't do that. He wants to snipe from the bushes and hope that people will think, 'These people can't be trusted.'”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in