Wal-Mart guilty of not paying millions of dollars in wages, federal judge rules
Judge rules that Wal-Mart violated minimum wage laws, case will go to trial next year
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Wal-Mart again finds itself on the wrong side of the labour debate after a federal judge ruled that the retail behemoth has not paid truckers for all the tasks they do. The company could end up having to pay up to $150 million.
US District Court Judge Susan Illston said that Wal-Mart violated California’s minimum wage law for failing to pay hundreds of truckers for tasks such as waiting in line to load or unload cargo, filling out mandatory forms, or fuelling their trucks, the Fresno Bee reported.
To counter the claim that drivers should be paid for each individual task, lawyers compared truckers’ tasks to that of housekeepers, who get paid per house cleaned, not each task done in each house.
If a Wal-Mart were to lose this case, it’s lawyers say it would set an absurd precedent for labour code. The example given in court filings was that housekeepers would have to be paid for wringing a mop and for each sweep of a broom.
Wal-Mart could end up owing between $100 million and $150 million in back pay, interest and penalties, said Butch Wagner, the attorney representing 720 past and present Wal-Mart truckers.
But Wal-Mart, which is the largest private employer in the US, says the company has violated no labour laws.
“There has been no finding that any Wal-Mart driver has not been paid minimum wage for each hour worked,” spokesman Randy Hargrove said. “We intend to continue to defend the company against the claim.”
The truckers also have accused Wal-Mart of violating other labour laws, including not providing meals or rest breaks. The lawsuit also questions whether the drivers are adequately paid for sleeping in their trucks during layovers.
Wal-Mart pays drivers $42 to stay in the cab during 10-hour layovers, according to court documents. Mr Wagner has claimed that pay is a violation of minimum wage, while Wal-Mart says that pay is a bonus and sleeping in the cab is not required.
The case is expected to go to full trial next year.
Follow @PaytonGuion on Twitter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments