Video: Australian runner wins 'vertical marathon' up the Empire State Building
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.With 86 flights of stairs, the prospect of running a marathon up the Empire State Building may be too much for even the hardiest of marathon runners.
Not so for Mark Bourne, the Canberran who won the 36th annual run up one of the tallest buildings in New York. He came in at 10 minutes and 12 seconds, afterwards saying that it was "a great feeling to come out on top".
He added: "It was pretty hectic at the start. I was second, third, second and at the 60th floor I took the lead."
In the women's division, Suzy Walsham, also from Australia, won with a time of 12 minutes and 5 seconds.
The race, which is organised by the New York Road Runners, saw 700 competitors from around the world race up the 1,576 steps from the lobby to the observation deck.
The previous champion, Thomas Dold from Germany, did not race for what could have been his eighth consecutive title, saying he had "364 days to think about" the next race.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments