US town responds to Free the Nipple campaign by making nudity laws even tighter
In the US, it is legal for women to go topless in cities, but less so in surrounding counties
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A small town in the US has responded to a women's nudity equality campaign by tightening the law yet further to ban "sideboob" and "underboob" - whilst removing a clause about having erection in public.
Council members in Springfield, Missouri, have branded a local Free the Nipple campaign, which says women should not be arrested for sunbathing topless, as “appalling”, according to the Springfield News-Leader.
And in a move which has angered campaigners, the council has now upped the restrictions to prevent women showing nipples "from the top of the areola all the way down, and round both sides - basically the bottom half of the breast".
According to a county government video, buttocks are also targeted by the new law, which now disallows men and women from showing any part of their buttocks rather than just covering "the centre third" (bottom crease).
At the same time, however, a clause which forbids "the showing of covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state" has been removed.
In the US, it is legal for women to be topless in many cities but not always their surrounding counties, according to pressure group GoTopless.
Yet the law is not always known by police officers, with many arresting women under wrongful "indecent exposure" or "disorderly conduct" measures - whilst other states such as Utah, Indiana and Tennessee have absolute laws banning women from showing their breasts.
Rebekah Stanford, a spokesperson against the new law in Springfield, said: "I am outraged that it is OK for women to be naked on magazine covers - but when I fight for my right for equality, I am suddenly indecent and immoral."
According to Springfield News Reader, local mayor Bob Stephens was disappointed by the outcome. He said: "I suspect when somebody writes the history of Springfield about this particular time, that chapter is going to be titled, ‘The Summer of Our Disappointment’. Because there’s plenty of disappointment to go around.”
However, councillor Justin Burnett described the topless rallies as "appalling". On 7 August he tweeted: "Tonight's topless rally - which subjects families to nudity - is outrageous. I am calling on the council to pass an enhanc 3800786701001 ed indecent exposure order."
There is now a Facebook campaign for Mr Burnett to be recalled from the council which has attracted more than a thousand members.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments