US spends 35 per cent more on military than a decade ago
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US military has essentially the same size, structure and capabilities as it did a decade ago but costs 35 per cent more, a public policy think tank has disclosed in an analysis of the 2012 defence budget.
The Centre for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments' report also said the Defence Department had spent some $46bn (£28.5bn) over the past decade developing weapons systems that were ultimately never used, either due to cost overruns or technical challenges.
"This was the opportunity of the decade to recapitalise and modernise the military's equipment, and that has been squandered," said Todd Harrison, who wrote the report. "We're looking at the prospect of a declining defence budget over the next decade and we're not going to have the opportunity to do that again."
With the US facing trillion-dollar budget deficits, President Obama has asked the Defence Department to cut some $400bn in spending over the next dozen years.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments