Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Congress Democrats push to stop ‘shrinkflation’ and target major food companies for the practice

Elizabeth Warren and Madeline Dean have written letters demanding that Coca-Cola, General Mills, and PepsiCo stop “profiteering”

Io Dodds
Monday 07 October 2024 17:48
Comments
Pennsylvania representative Madeline Dean, left, and Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren, right, have written to three US food and drink giants about ‘shrinkflation'
Pennsylvania representative Madeline Dean, left, and Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren, right, have written to three US food and drink giants about ‘shrinkflation' (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

Two Democratic congresswomen are demanding that Coca-Cola, General Mills, and PepsiCo stop "profiteering" by shrinking the size of their products without lowering prices.

Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren and Pennsylvania representative Madeline Dean wrote letters to the three food and drink giants on Sunday calling for them to pay their fair share of taxes and cease engaging in "shrinkflation.”

They accused all three companies of reducing the size of their products, such as General Mills' Cocoa Puffs and PepsiCo's Gatorade, while charging the same price or higher – a stealthy twin of inflation that Joe Biden has denounced as "a rip-off.” Shrinkflation is one common alternative to raising costs for companies under pressure from – or, if you believe their critics, hoping to exploit – the general rise in costs during times of high inflation.

"People have noticed that their box of Cheerios and bag of Doritos are smaller, but prices are higher – and at the same time these giant corporations are paying lower tax rates than the average American," Warren told NBC News, which first reported the letters.

"We can’t let them get away with this price gouging and tax dodging. It’s just plain wrong, and we’re fighting back."

Spokespeople for the three companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The Independent. But the Consumer Brands Association, a trade group that includes all three firms, told NBC that the attacks were "misleading".

"Aggregate markups over the past three years are not unusual compared with previous economic recoveries," a spokesperson for the group reportedly said, citing a recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. "The industry remains focused on providing the best products at the most competitive price to consumers."

Pennsylvania representative Madeline Dean, left, and Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren, right, have written to three US food and drink giants about ‘shrinkflation'
Pennsylvania representative Madeline Dean, left, and Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren, right, have written to three US food and drink giants about ‘shrinkflation' (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

A report last December by Democratic senator Bob Casey found that shrinking package sizes accounted for around 10 percent of the increase in price per unit for household items (such as toilet paper) and snacks (such as corn chips and Oreos).

In their letters, Warren and Dean also zoomed in on the 2017 tax cuts championed by Republicans and signed into law by Donald Trump, which they argue "incentivized price gouging" by reducing the taxes that companies could expect to pay on every extra dollar they charged.

The congresswomen asked Coca-Cola, General Mills, and PepsiCo to respond stating the average price per ounce of soda or cereal that they have charged every year since 2018, how much more in federal taxes they would have paid if not for the 2017 cuts, and whether company executives had gotten any extra compensation while inflation was at its highest.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in