Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US National Archives forced to apologise for blurring anti-Trump rally signs

Agency launches review 'so this does not happen again'

Chris Riotta
New York
Saturday 18 January 2020 15:36 EST
Comments
Police officers high-five demonstrators on women's march

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The US National Archives has apologised and announced it will remove its display featuring a photo from the 2017 Women’s March that blurred out multiple signs critical of Donald Trump and replace it with the unaltered image.

The independent US agency tasked with preserving historical and political records acknowledged it made a “mistake” in a statement announcing the switch after reports of the edited display were met with swift backlash.

“As the National Archives of the United States, we are and have always been completely committed to preserving our archival holdings, without alteration,” the National Archives wrote in a statement posted to Twitter. “We have removed the current display and will replace it as soon as possible with one that uses the unaltered image.”

The statement continued: “We apologise, and will immediately start a thorough review of our exhibit policies and procedures so that this does not happen again.”

The photo initially blotted out the president’s name in one sign that read “God Hates Trump” and another that said “Trump & GOP - Hands Off Women”.

It also blurred words on signs referencing women’s anatomy, including one that read “If my vagina could shoot bullets, it'd be less REGULATED”.

In its statement apologizing for the digital alterations, the National Archives noted that it was “not an archival record” but instead a photograph the agency had “licensed to use as a promotional graphic”, adding: “Nonetheless, we were wrong to alter the image.”

Miriam Kleiman, a spokesperson for the National Archives, acknowledged in a statement earlier this week that the agency altered the image “so as not to engage in current political controversy”.

“Our mission is to safeguard and provide access to the nation's most important federal records, and our exhibits are one way in which we connect the American people to those records,” she added. “Modifying the image was an attempt on our part to keep the focus on the records.”

The decision to replace the display with an unedited version of the photograph from the 2017 march came as thousands of demonstrators participated in the 2020 Women’s March, with more than 250 marches happening throughout the US.

The Women’s March official Twitter handle wrote in a post how the signs are an “inspiring” part of the demonstrations held each year.

The 2017 Women’s March was the largest day of protests in modern American history and saw crowds that greatly outmatched Mr Trump’s inauguration the prior day.

On Saturday, thousands of women and men gathered in over 180 cities across the country, from New York to California,

to participate in the annual demonstrations. This year’s turnout appeared noticeably smaller in many of the events associated with the Women’s March, which is held each year in January.

Washington saw demonstrations outside of the White House, though the president was spending the weekend at his resort in Florida.

The Women’s March has been somewhat criticised in recent years over issues with inclusion, and for seemingly failing to address local issues, the Associated Press reported.

The Black Lives Matter chapter in Washington wrote a letter this week to the Women’s March organisers calling on the demonstrations to recognise that “local DC is a domestic colony”, as the capitol does not have representation in Congress.

The letter read: “Here in D.C., these unstrategic mass mobilizations distract from local organising, often overlook the black people who actually live here and even result in tougher laws against demonstration being passed locally.”

Still, many have celebrated the demonstrations for providing a symbolic show of force against the Trump administration.

Jennifer Siebel Newsom, wife of California Governor Gavin Newsom, told demonstrators in downtown Los Angeles: “In 2020, I have no doubt that it will be women who will lead again, rise up and move this country forward on a path toward justice.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in