Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judge blocks Trump’s attempt to proceed with controversial wealth test in green card application process

Policy ‘fails to measure up to gravity of global pandemic,’ says judge Daniels

Neil Vigdor
Friday 31 July 2020 13:42 EDT
Comments
Ken Cuccinelli announces the public charge rule for immigrants

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration on Wednesday from moving forward with plans to deny green cards or permanent citizenship to immigrants who have received Medicaid, food stamps or housing vouchers, even on a limited basis — a wealth test that several states, led by New York, sued over during the coronavirus pandemic.

The judge, George Daniels of the US District Court in Manhattan, granted a nationwide temporary injunction, suspending the eligibility requirements that were introduced last year and have drawn several legal challenges, including before the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court ruled in January that the Trump administration could move forward with the plan, but that was before the pandemic.

In the past, green card applicants who relied on social services as their primary means of financial support or were institutionalised could be denied permanent residency under what is known as the “public charge” rule. But fewer than 1 per cent of applicants were previously disqualified on public charge grounds.

Donald Trump has sought an expansion of the requirements, but critics argued that they could have a chilling effect for legal immigrants who needed medical treatment or financial aid during the pandemic.

Mr Daniels wrote that the policy “fails to measure up to the gravity of this global pandemic that continues to threaten the lives and economic well-being of America’s residents”.

“No person should hesitate to seek medical care, nor should they endure punishment or penalty if they seek temporary financial aid as a result of the pandemic’s impact,” he added.

It was the latest immigration clash between Democrats and the Trump administration, which was thwarted by the Supreme Court last month from ending a programme protecting about 700,000 young immigrants known as Dreamers from deportation. This month, the administration walked back a plan to strip visas from international students who took only online classes.

“This is a major victory to protect the health of our communities across New York and the entire nation,” attorney general Letitia James of New York, a Democrat, wrote on Twitter on Wednesday.

The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Wednesday night.

The lawsuit’s plaintiffs included New York City, Connecticut and Vermont.

Attorney general William Tong of Connecticut, a Democrat, said in an interview on Wednesday night that he expected the Trump administration to appeal the ruling.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that the president plans to continue his war on immigrants as long as he’s president,” Mr Tong said.

Mr Tong said that applicants for green cards or permanent citizenship would forgo trips to the doctor or applying for food stamps to avoid being penalised.

“This is a big win for the rule of law and for fairness and public health,” he said. “This is about how utterly unsafe and insane it is to try to deter people from seeking treatment for Covid or any other condition in the middle of a pandemic.”

New York Times

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in