Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump administration scrambles to complete nuclear deal with Russia before election

US president has long sought to negotiate arms control deal with Moscow

Paul Sonne,John Hudson
Wednesday 23 September 2020 09:50 EDT
Comments
Moscow is probably calculating whether Trump or Biden would offer more favourable terms
Moscow is probably calculating whether Trump or Biden would offer more favourable terms (AFP via Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Frustration is mounting inside the Trump administration as Russia gives little indication of whether it will agree to an arms control deal before Donald Trump faces reelection, according to senior US administration officials, who are trying to secure the deal.

US officials presented a proposal to the Russians two weeks ago in Vienna as part of negotiations that began in June. Under the deal, the United States and Russia would extend the soon-to-expire New START pact for a limited time while negotiating a replacement treaty. Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin would sign a political agreement outlining a framework for the replacement treaty and what it would cover.

The administration's scramble to cut a deal with Russia before the election comes as the president's top diplomats have been rushing to secure diplomatic achievements as US voters begin going to the polls.

Mr Trump has long sought to negotiate an arms control deal with Moscow, but so far his administration has only pulled out of pacts with the former Cold War foe, citing violations by Russia. In comments on 4 September, Mr Trump said arms control talks with Russia were a "very important thing" - more important than addressing global warming. Mr Trump and Mr Putin have been discussing a deal for months.

But the Russian government has given the US negotiators little direct feedback outside public commentary since they presented their proposal about two weeks ago, according to US officials. The result is US frustration, which boiled over into comments in a Russian media outlet by Mr Trump's top nuclear negotiator, Marshall Billingslea, and a response from his Russian counterpart.

The "price of admission" for Russia to secure the deal with the United States will go up if the Kremlin doesn't agree to terms before the US presidential election, Mr Billingslea warned in an interview on Monday with the Russian newspaper Kommersant. Mr Billingslea said the United States would insist on "a number of new conditions" if Russia waits until after the election to decide and Mr Trump wins.

Russian deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov, Russia's main arms control negotiator, warned that such ultimatums wouldn't result in a deal.

"Either they can stop making their ultimatums and we can start to negotiate something, or there will be no agreement," Mr Ryabkov told the Russian state news agency RIA Novosti. Mr Ryabkov said the US demands don't correspond to Russia's idea of what must be done to ensure strategic stability.

In his own separate interview with Kommersant, Mr Ryabkov said "the offer made by the Americans does not look like a good deal" and rejected the US preconditions. Still, US officials didn't read Mr Ryabkov's comments as the final word on whether Russia would agree to some sort of deal before the election or thereafter.

At stake is the future of New START, a 2010 treaty that expires in February and restricts the number of deployed strategic nuclear warheads and certain launch platforms. If the treaty isn't extended or replaced, the world's two biggest nuclear powers will return to an era without substantive restraints on their arsenals for the first time in decades, potentially paving the way for a new nuclear arms race.

Because the Trump administration didn't begin substantive negotiations until this year, the arms control standoff is colliding with the American political calendar. Moscow is probably calculating whether Mr Trump or Democratic nominee Joe Biden would offer more favourable terms.

Russia has said it would like to extend the treaty, which includes a clause that can prolong the pact for five years without ratification if both presidents agree. In his online platform, Mr Biden has said he would pursue an extension of New START, which Barack Obama negotiated.

The Trump administration, however, has argued that New START is insufficient because it doesn't include China and regulates only a portion of Russia's nuclear arsenal. The administration is willing to extend the pact only if its replacement addresses those issues and others. China has rejected US calls to join the talks with Russia, citing its smaller nuclear arsenal.

The proposal offered by Mr Billingslea two weeks ago in Vienna goes beyond the parameters of New START to encompass all the nuclear warheads of both countries, a senior US official said. It would include a complex monitoring system allowing both nations to observe which nuclear weapons are coming into Russian or American facilities for refurbishment and which are coming out of the facilities for deployment.

The proposal also allows for an increased number of inspections and faster access to sites that inspectors request to visit, among other things, the senior official said.

US officials drafted the proposal in the form of a political agreement that would become a treaty once China agrees to join the accord - a goal that has eluded US negotiators.

The lack of response by Moscow to the proposal has led some US officials to conclude that Mr Putin has not empowered Mr Ryakbov to cut a deal. Mr Billingslea made his public comments to the Russian newspaper Kommersant in part to underscore the US offer to Mr Putin and seek clarity from the Russian side on its interest in an agreement, according to the US officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing diplomatic negotiations.

"So far the proposal stands in the form that we made it in. If and when Moscow expresses a desire to go down this path that, frankly speaking, President Putin has already discussed multiple times with President Trump, then we are ready," Mr Billingslea told Kommersant.

Promoting himself as a dealmaker, Mr Trump has sought to undertake nuclear arms control negotiations with Russia since the 1980s, when he expressed an interest in conducting talks with the Soviets on behalf of the Reagan administration. When asked about the recent poisoning of Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny at a 4 September White House news conference, Mr Trump instead emphasised that arms control talks were underway.

"With Russia, we're right now negotiating a nuclear nonproliferation treaty, which is very important. It's a very important thing. To me, it's the most important thing," Mr Trump said. "Some people say 'global warming', I don't. I say this is far more important."

The Trump administration began substantive negotiations with Russia over New START in earnest only this year, leaving insufficient time to hammer out an entirely new treaty.

The result is an attempt to extend the current treaty, likely for a year or two, on the condition that Russia agrees to certain elements in a follow-on treaty. Such a deal would allow Mr Trump to tout a nuclear accord with Russia on the campaign trail, even if the specifics of a new treaty haven't actually been hashed out - and may not result in an actual follow-on pact.

The Trump administration has had little success securing arms control deals.

US officials have failed to reach a formal pact with North Korea, which has tested nuclear warheads and intercontinental ballistic missiles. The administration has also been unable to negotiate a new deal with Iran, which has exceeded the restrictions on its nuclear program set by a 2015 international nuclear agreement that Mr Trump abandoned.

The Washington Post

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in