US Supreme Court approves Trump asylum curbs
‘This is just a temporary step, and we’re hopeful we’ll prevail at the end of the day,’ says ACLU lawyer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Supreme Court has allowed a new Trump administration rule, preventing most people at the US-Mexico border from claiming asylum, to temporarily take effect.
Current White House policy aims to deny asylum to anyone who passes through a safe country on the way to the US without seeking protection there first.
The vast majority of migrants at the border come from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala, meaning in most cases they will be expected to apply for asylum in Mexico.
The policy is currently subject to legal challenges.
If it is upheld, it would reverse decades of immigration policy and prevent anyone other than Mexicans and Canadians from first seeking asylum in the US.
A lower-court ruling had blocked the policy from being enforced in some states along the southern border until the matter was resolved.
But the order issued by the Supreme Court late on Wednesday reverses that ruling and allows the policy to go into effect while the appeals process continues.
“BIG United States Supreme Court WIN for the Border on Asylum!” Donald Trump said on Twitter, following the announcement.
Mr Trump’s administration has struck an increasingly aggressive tone on immigration at the southern border.
Most of the people at the US-Mexico border are Central Americans seeking to escape poverty and violence in their home countries.
The majority of this group will be ineligible for asylum in the US under the new rule, as will those from Africa, Asia and South America.
“This is just a temporary step, and we’re hopeful we’ll prevail at the end of the day,” said Lee Gelernt, an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawyer representing immigration advocacy groups in the case.
“The lives of thousands of families are at stake.”
In May, Amnesty International USA’s advocacy director for the Americas condemned the move.
“This latest policy is a disgusting example of the lengths the Trump administration will go to to deny people protection,” Charanya Krishnaswami said.
Numerous courts have already considered the policy.
A judge in San Francisco first blocked the rule from taking effect in a late July hearing.
That ruling was later narrowed by an appeals court, so it only applied to Arizona and California.
The Supreme Court’s order allows the Trump administration to enforce the rule across the US.
It is unclear how quickly the policy will be enforced and how it fits in with other administration efforts to tighten asylum rules.
More than 30,000 people have already been turned back from the border and sent to Mexico, to wait for the resolution of their asylum claims.
Thousands more are waiting at the border to be allowed to submit a claim.
At the moment many asylum seekers at the border pass an initial screening, known as a “credible fear” interview.
Under the new policy most will fail unless they have sought and been denied asylum in at least one county on the way to the border.
If they fail, they will be placed in fast-track deportation proceedings and flown to their home countries.
Additional reporting by agencies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments