Donald Trump's executive order against sanctuary cities blocked nationwide by judge ruling
Federal judge rules that Donald Trump's sanctuary city executive order would be used for more than just blocking law enforcement grants
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judge in San Francisco has blocked Donald Trump's executive order withholding funds from sanctuary cities that fail to comply with federal immigration demands.
The block came after San Francisco and Santa Clara County asked the courts to intervene, arguing that more than $1 billion was at stake for each of them.
In his ruling US District Judge William Orrick III wrote that the language of the executive order made it clear that the Trump administration planned on using the order to block funding for more than just law enforcement as federal lawyers had argued.
“And if there was doubt about the scope of the Order, the President and Attorney General have erased it with their public comments,” he wrote.
Sanctuary cities generally don’t allow the use of local funds to comply with federal immigration requests, including civil detainer requests in which Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers request that a local jail detain an inmate for up to 48 hours after their scheduled release date so immigration officials can decide if they want to detain them.
The court's intervention is another setback for Mr Trump, who has struggled to secure a major legislative victory in his first 100 days in office and has has been challenged by opponents on some of his highest profile executive actions aimed at fulfilling campaign promises.
That includes two controversial travel bans that were halted in federal courts that would have restricted travel into the United States from several predominantly Muslim countries.
Mr Trump had made eliminating sanctuary cities a major part of his campaign after an undocumented immigrant shot and killed 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle as she walked with her father in the city. Following the news of her death, Mr Trump began repeatedly referencing her on the campaign trail.
But supporters of sanctuary cities have vehemently opposed Mr Trump’s efforts to pull federal funding from cities that don’t comply with federal immigration officials. In addition to San Francisco and Santa Clara County, two Massachusetts cities and a third California city filed lawsuits against Mr Trump’s executive order.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments