Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Federal judge blocks Trump from defunding sanctuary cities

The decision is the latest in Chicago's lawsuit against the Department of Justice

Emily Shugerman
New York
Friday 15 September 2017 17:09 EDT
Comments
Maya Casillas, 7, joins migrant rights group during a vigil to protest against US President Donald Trump's new crackdown on 'sanctuary cities', outside the City Hall in Los Angeles
Maya Casillas, 7, joins migrant rights group during a vigil to protest against US President Donald Trump's new crackdown on 'sanctuary cities', outside the City Hall in Los Angeles (MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A federal judge has barred the Trump administration from withholding funds from so-called "sanctuary cities" that refuse to implement Washington's latest, stringent immigration policies.

Judge Harry Leinenweber ruled that the Justice Department cannot keep public safety grant money from sanctuary cities, such as Chicago, until the city's lawsuit against the Department is decided.

Chicago city officials filed suit against the Justice Department in August, claiming they were being "blackmailed" into implementing the Department's policies. They claim Attorney General Jeff Sessions overstepped his bounds by requiring cities to give federal immigration officials access to their jails, among other things.

At least other seven cities and counties have also refused to implement the new rules.

In a temporary victory for these cities, Mr Leinenweber halted the withholding of funds nationwide, saying there is "no reason to think that the legal issues present in this case are restricted to Chicago or that the statutory authority given to the Attorney General would differ in another jurisdiction".

The city of Chicago, a frequent target of criticism from Mr Trump, recently applied for $2.2m in public safety funding from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance grant programme. But in July, the Department of Justice announced that the grant money would only be given to cities that "comply with federal law, allow federal immigration access to detention facilities, and provide 48 hours notice before they release an illegal alien wanted by federal authorities."

“This administration will not simply give away grant dollars to city governments that proudly violate the rule of law and protect criminal aliens at the expense of public safety," Mr Sessions said at the time.

Chicago Mayor: 'To all the Dreamers in this city, this is your home'

The grant money is meagre compared to Chicago's operating budget, but winning it would be a symbolic victory for the city. Chicago officials, including Mayor Rahm Emmanuel, have long opposed the Trump administration's crack-down on undocumented immigrants.

"We want you to come to Chicago if you believe in the American dream," Mr Emanuel, a Democrat, told CNN's Poppy Harlow last month. "By forcing us, or the police department, to choose between the values of the city and the philosophy of the police department, in community policing, I think it's a false choice and it undermines our actual safety agenda."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in