Trump proposes cutting refugee cap to historic low of 45,000
Democrats, humanitarian groups decry the move
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump has proposed admitting no more than 45,000 refugees to the United States, continuing his streak of stringent immigration measures.
That cap would impose the toughest limit in decades despite what humanitarian groups have called a global refugee crisis, with the United Nations reporting that 65.6 million people - the most on record - were displaced in 2016. By contrast, former president Barack Obama had moved to allow 110,000 refugees into the country in 2017.
Mr Trump has made limiting immigration, both legal and illegal, a centrepiece of his policy agenda. He has sought to augment deportations of immigrants in the country illegally and to block more illegal entries by erecting a border wall between the US and Mexico.
Arrests of undocumented immigrants rose this year compared to 2016 and border apprehensions surged by 60 per cent this summer, according to federal data, though Mr Trump has yet to convince Congress to fund his wall.
He has also taken aim at legal migration, embracing a bill that would have slashed admittances and enacting a ban on travellers from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen.
Such measures have been popular with Trump supporters who gravitated toward his nativist message. Republican lawmakers praised Mr Trump’s refugee limit, saying it would help safeguard national security.
“The Trump Administration’s refugee ceiling for the coming year maintains our nation’s generosity toward those in need, and importantly, ensures limited resources are used wisely and our citizens are protected in light of ongoing terrorist threats,” Representative Bob Goodlatte - a Virginia Republican who heads the committee that oversees immigration - said in a statement, arguing that the new level would help reduce a backlog caused by a flood of asylum-seekers.
But Democrats and humanitarian groups reacted with dismay to Mr Trump’s announcement, saying it forfeited America’s moral authority and ceded the country’s role as a shelter for the persecuted.
Senator Dianne Feinstein of California released a statement calling the proposed cap “completely unacceptable”, saying America was “not doing its part to respond to this global crisis”. Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois called the move “unconscionable”.
“Since our nation’s tragic failure to help Jewish refugees fleeing Hitler, we have set an example for the world by providing safe haven to the world’s most vulnerable people”, Mr Durbin said in a statement, calling Mr Trump’s proposal “an abdication”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments