Judge agrees to temporarily lift gag order in Trump’s 2020 election interference case
US District Judge Tanya Chutkan put order in place to limit public statements about federal criminal case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case has agreed to temporarily lift a narrow gag order on the former president.
US District Judge Tanya Chutkan had put the order in place to limit Mr Trump’s public statements about the federal criminal case, in which he is accused of illegally attempting to undo his 2020 loss.
It comes on the same day that Mr Trump was fined $5,000 by a New York Judge for violating a separate gag order in his ongoing civil lawsuit.
The gag order issued by judge Chutkan on Monday barred the former president from making public statements targeting prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses.
It has been the most serious restriction a court has placed on Mr Trump and his inflammatory rhetoric, which has been a recent staple of his court room appearances and campaign to return to the White House.
The Friday ruling allows Mr Trump’s lawyers time to prove why his comments should not be restricted as the case heads toward trial.
Lawyers for Mr Trump previously said that the restrictions were “egregious and intolerable” adding that the former president “has not unlawfully threatened or harassed anyone” and that prosecutors had not “come close” to justifying the order, The Associated Press reported.
"By restricting President Trump’s speech, the Gag Order eviscerates the rights of his audiences, including hundreds of millions of American citizens who the Court now forbids from listening to President Trump’s thoughts on important issues," the defense wrote, per AP.
Mr Trump, who has previously used rallies and social media to villify members of the prosecution, also described the gag order as unconstitutional and has used it to amplify his claims that he is being politically persecuted.
The former president has denied any wrongdoing in the case charging him with illegally scheming to overturn his 2020 election loss to president Joe Biden.
On Friday Judge Chutkan ordered special counsel Jack Smith’s team to file by Wednesday any opposition to Mr Trump’s bid for a longer pause on the gag order pending appeal. Jury selection for the trail against the former president and 18 co-defendants, began on Friday morning.
Elsewhere on Friday, the judge in Mr Trump’s civil fraud trial fined the former president $5,000 and threatened to throw him in jail for breaking a seperate gag order, imposed in the first week of the New York proceedings.
On 3 October, Judge Arthur Engoron banned Mr Trump from “posting, emailing or speaking publicly” about any members of his court staff, after the former president made a post on Truth Social attacking his law clerk and levelling baseless claims against her.
He was ordered to take the post down, however, while he deleted the post from Truth Social it remained on his website. It has now been deleted.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments