Trump will declare national emergency to build border wall after failing to secure funding
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump will declare a national emergency to build a wall along the southern US border after failing to secure funding for the measure through Congress.
The president plans on issuing that declaration after he signs the government funding bill that Congress is poised to approve to keep the government funded until the end of the fiscal year and avert a second damaging shutdown in two months. The plan was confirmed by White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders just before the Senate voted in favour of advancing the funding package.
“I just had an opportunity to speak with President Trump and he’s prepared to sign the bill,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on the Senate floor on Thursday. “He will also be signing a national emergency declaration at the same time.”
Such a declaration from the president is likely to be met with swift legal challenges that could hobble the effort.
In response to the news, speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi said that a national emergency to build the border wall amounts to an “end run” around Congress, and said that Mr Trump has created the crisis he claims is seen at the border. Ms Pelosi confirmed that Democrats could challenge the president in court if he declares the national emergency, and suggested that there are other emergencies like gun violence that are more pressing than the situation at the border.
“That’s an option,” Ms Pelosi said of filing legal action against the president if he declares a national emergency. “When the president declares this emergency, first of all, it’s not an emergency.”
Ms Pelosi, the top Democrat in Washington, was not alone in saying that Mr Trump would set a dangerous precedent if he goes through with the state of emergency. Most, though, indicated that they would need to see the text of the declaration to know their position, according to CNN.
“Clearly I have concerns about using this declaration for this set of circumstances,” Senator Roy Blunt, the Republican Policy Committee Chairman, said.
“I generally don’t think it’s a good idea,” Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who was defeated in 2016 by Mr Trump in the Republican primaries, said.
“It’s a bad idea,” Kentucky Rand Paul, who also ran for the Republican nomination in 2016, said.
It is unclear how the American people would respond to Mr Trump declaring a national emergency to build his wall, but polling in recent weeks suggests that the majority of Americans do not support the idea.
A recent CBS News poll, for instance, found that 66 per cent of Americans did not approve of the president declaring a national emergency to build the wall.
The tentative government funding deal that will be voted on in Congress on Thursday would provide far less funding than the $5.7bn (£4.45bn) that Mr Trump previously demanded, with just under $1.4bn (£1.09bn) that will be used to fund 55 miles (89km) of new wall.
“Reviewing the funding bill with my team at the [White House],” Mr Trump tweeted on Thursday morning.
The bill would ensure that the 800,000 government workers who were furloughed or forced to work without pay for 35 days starting in late December will not suffer a similar fate.
During that time, federal employees were forced to find second jobs to pay the bills – often by driving Uber, or through online fundraising – and for petrol to get them to and from the jobs for which they were not receiving pay.
The new funding bill does not, however, include a mandate for backpay for the federal workers who went without pay.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments