Judge rejects Trump's administration's blanket request to delay reuniting children at border
'It must comply with the time frame unless there is an articulable reason'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal judge has refused a blanket request from the Trump administration for extra time time to reunite migrant children and their parents separated at the US-Mexico border, saying extensions will only granted in cases where there was an “articulable” reason.
Last month, District Judge Dana Sabraw issued an order for the government to reunite up to 3,000 children split from their families as a result of a “zero tolerance” immigration policy that resulted in officials charging anyone apprehended crossing the border illegally. He ordered children under the age of five to be reunited with their parents by July 10, and for all children to be reunited by July 26.
As the government responded to the court order, making use of DNA testing to speed up the process, it appealed for extra time to reunite families. “The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) anticipates, however, in some instances it will not be able to complete the additional processes within the timelines the court prescribed, particularly with regard to class members who are already not in government custody,” the government’s lawyers wrote last week.
But Mr Sabraw rejected the blanket request for extra time, acknowledging instead, that more time may be justified only in specific cases. The administration said it needed more time to reunite 101 children under 5 years old to ensure the children’s safety and to confirm their parental relationships.
“There’s always going to be tension between a fast release and a safe release,” said Sarah Fabian, a Justice Department lawyer, according to the Associate Press.
On Friday, Mr Sabraw ordered the government to share a list of the 101 children with the American Civil Liberties Union, which successfully sued to force the reunions. The two sides will try to determine over the weekend which cases merit a delay in an effort to present a unified front in court on Monday morning.
“The government must reunite them,” the judge said. “It must comply with the time frame unless there is an articulable reason.”
The administration has matched 86 parents to 83 children and 16 are not yet matched, Ms Fabian said.
On Thursday, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar told reporters fewer than 3,000 children were believed to have been separated, but that includes children who may have lost parents along the journey, not just parents who were detained at the border.
“HHS knows the identity and location of every minor in the care of our grantees,” said Mr Azar. “And HHS is executing on our mission, even with the constraints handed down by the courts.”
The judge, who was appointed by President George W Bush, set the deadline last week, writing that the “situation has reached a crisis level” and said the “chaotic circumstances” were of the government’s own making.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments