Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump’s judicial nominee confirmed by US Senate despite ‘outspoken hatred’ towards LGBT+ people

‘His lifetime appointment to the federal bench by Trump and Pence will now present a clear threat to the rights and livelihoods of LGBTQ people for decades to come’

Colby Itkowitz
Thursday 20 June 2019 06:41 EDT
Comments
Senator Patty Murray opposes nomination of Trump judicial candidate Matthew Kacsmaryk due to anti-LGBT views

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

The US Senate confirmed a controversial judicial nominee Wednesday over objections from civil rights groups and Democrats who criticised President Donald Trump’s pick as being hostile to the LGBT+ community.

One Republican, Senator Susan Collins of Maine, joined every voting Democrat to oppose Matthew Kacsmaryk’s lifetime appointment to the federal bench in the Northern District of Texas.

He was confirmed 52-46.

“Mr Kacsmaryk has demonstrated a hostility to the LGBTQ bordering on paranoia,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said before the vote.

“It’s unbelievable that this man has been nominated, and he’s not alone...One Republican senator rightfully voiced concerns about this man’s fitness. Where are the others?”

Ms Collins, in a statement last week announcing her intention to vote “no”, said Mr Kacsmaryk’s “extreme statements” on LGBTQ and reproductive rights issues “reflect poorly on Mr Kacsmaryk’s temperament and suggest an inability to respect precedent and to apply the law fairly and impartially”.

While Ms Collins, who had angered LGBT+ and women’s rights groups with her vote for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, sided with them this time, Senator Lisa Murkowski, another ally of those groups who voted against Justice Kavanaugh, did not.

Ms Murkowski’s office did not return a request for comment about her vote for Kacsmaryk.

“The courts have been at the forefront of securing LGBTQ equality on many fronts, including the necessary and lifesaving legal protections opposed by Kacsmaryk and many other Trump nominees,” said Gillian Branstetter, spokeswoman for the National Centre for Transgender Equality.

“We would hope any lawmaker who believes in the need for that equality would understand the importance of inoculating the legal system from the kinds of bias and prejudice held by Kacsmaryk.”

Opponents of Mr Kacsmaryk’s nomination point to his writings, in which he has described being transgender as a “mental disorder”, called homosexuality “disordered” and said “sexual revolutionaries” had made unborn children and marriage secondary to “erotic desires of liberated adults”.

“This person being in a position of power anywhere in government would be deeply troubling, but his lifetime appointment to the federal bench by Trump and Pence will now present a clear threat to the rights and livelihoods of LGBTQ people for decades to come,” said Charlotte Clymer, press secretary of Human Rights Campaign.

“It is unconscionable that this person would be confirmed to arbitrate our constitutional rights despite his outspoken hatred towards LGBTQ people.”

Mr Kacsmaryk most recently served as deputy general counsel at First Liberty Institute, a legal organisation that defends religious freedom cases.

Trump pledges to cure cancer, eradicate AIDs and send astronauts to Mars

His former boss there, Kelly Shackelford, president and CEO, said after the confirmation vote: “Matthew has spent his career fighting to defend our God-given, constitutionally protected rights.

“Matthew’s confirmation is further evidence that presidential appointees who strictly adhere to the text of the Constitution and the founders’ original intent for our most fundamental freedoms, including religious liberty, can and will be confirmed by the US Senate.”

Several Democrats and advocates pointed out the particular sting of Mr Kacsmaryk’s confirmation occurring during Pride Month.

Washington Post

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in