Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump claims Mar-a-Lago surveillance tape of FBI ‘looks like a military coup’

Mr Trump says the FBI has asked him to keep surveillance footage private because identifying the FBI agents involved in the search of his property could compromise their safety

Andrew Feinberg
Washington, DC
Tuesday 20 September 2022 11:21 EDT
Comments
Trump gives rambling conclusion to Newsmax interview with actor Jon Voight

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Former president Donald Trump on Tuesday claimed surveillance footage of the court-authorised FBI search of his Palm Beach, Florida, home shows a scene akin to one in which the military deposes a civilian government.

Since leaving office in January 2021, Mr Trump has maintained his primary residence and post-presidential office at Mar-a-Lago, a 1920s-era mansion which he turned into a private club in the mid-1990s. The property has surveillance cameras throughout, and those cameras remained turned on when FBI agents executed a search warrant there on 8 August.

According to an unsealed copy of the receipt Mr Trump’s lawyers recieved following the search, investigators recovered more than 100 “unique documents with classification markings” from locations throughout the mansion, including from Mr Trump’s desk.

Though Justice Department officials have said they attempted to execute the search with discretion, Mr Trump has repeatedly described the event as a “ransacking” of his private spaces.

Speaking during a call-in interview on the right-wing Newsmax network, Mr Trump expanded on his description of events, telling the anchors that agents had “swarmed the place”.

“It looks like a military coup. It's not a pretty picture,” he said when asked about the surveillance footage.

The twice-impeached ex-president said he has not released the footage because the FBI has asked him to refrain from doing so out of concern for the safety of the agents who conducted the search.

“They've asked us not to put it out, but we do have it,” he said.

Mr Trump’s past conduct regarding the safety of FBI agents may have given rise to concerns for agents’ safety if the footage were to become public.

In a memorandum asking a Florida judge to keep parts of the affidavit used to obtain the search warrant under seal, Department of Justice attorneys said it was necessary to shield certain details in the affidavit from public view in order to protect “multiple civilian witnesses whose information was included throughout the affidavit”.

Prosecutors also said protecting witness identities is necessary because they may be subject to retaliation, intimidation or harassment from Mr Trump’s supporters, including threats against their lives or safety. Mr Trump’s camp previously released the names of two agents who conducted the search to the right-wing Breitbart News website, leading to those agents becoming targets for the ex-president’s followers.

“FBI agents who have been publicly identified in connection with this investigation have received repeated threats of violence from members of the public. Exposure of witnesses' identities would likely erode their trust in the government’s investigation, and it would almost certainly chill other potential witnesses from coming forward in this investigation and others,” they wrote.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in