Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump’s Jan 6 committee ‘fishing expedition’ denied by DC judge

Federal judge Tanya Chutkan denies former president’s attempt to subpoena ‘missing’ records

Alex Woodward
Monday 27 November 2023 20:36 EST
Related vide: Fani Willis appears in court to argue Trump co-defendant’s bond should be revoked

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case has rejected what she likened to a bad-faith “fishing expedition” for documents from the congressional committee that investigated the events surrounding the January 6 attack on the US Capitol.

US District Judge Tanya Chutkan shot down the attempt from the former president’s legal team to obtain what it labelled “missing” records from the committee, which had turned over reams of documents to federal archivists and publicly shared thousands of pages of transcripts from hearings and interviews as part of its mammoth report.

“The broad scope of the records that [Mr Trump] seeks, and his vague description of their potential relevance, resemble less ‘a good faith effort to obtain identified evidence’ than they do ‘a general ‘fishing expedition,’” the judge wrote in a filing on Monday.

Last month, Mr Trump’s attorneys requested subpoenas for several executive and congressional offices, including House lawmakers and the US archivist, to review what they called an “overlap” in evidence and testimony from the committee’s investigation and the federal criminal probe into Mr Trump’s attempts to overturn 2020 presidential election results.

Mr Trump “seeks to retrieve certain missing records and uncover information about their disposition,” according to their request.

Democratic US Rep Bennie Thompson, who chaired the committee, said that all permanent records of the committee were archived according to House Rules. Interviews and depositions were transcribed by “nonpartisan, professional official reporters” and were reviewed for errors by both the witnesses and committee staff, he wrote.

A trial stemming from a grand jury indictment and investigation under US Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith is expected to begin in March 2024, as Mr Trump navigates four criminal indictments and several lawsuits as he seeks the Republican nomination for president in his run for the White House.

An indictment with federal charges in the election interference case alleges three criminal conspiracies and a multi-state scheme to undermine the democratic process and obstruct Joe Biden’s victory.

Mr Trump is separately charged in a state case in Georgia along with more than a dozen co-defendants as part of a Fulton County investigation and grand jury indictment outlining an alleged “criminal enterprise” to subvert the state’s election results.

That trial is expected to begin in August 2024.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in