Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Harvard law professor predicts indictment of Donald Trump is coming

Garland previously pledged to follow evidence wherever it leads

John Bowden
Monday 04 July 2022 01:17 EDT
Comments
Ex-Trump official says Cassidy Hutchinson's life will 'never be the same' after testimony

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Harvard law professor whose roster of former students includes President Joe Biden’s attorney general, Merrick Garland, predicted that the Justice Department would seek to indict Donald Trump with criminal charges related to the January 6 attack on Congress.

Laurence Tribe made the prediction on CNN on Saturday, speaking to host Wolf Blitzer, who asked the professor point-blank if he thought the DOJ was heading in that direction.

“Merrick Garland is a friend and a former student of mine. He’s an honest man, he’s serious, he said he’d go to the top if that’s where the evidence points and that’s certainly where it’s pointing now,” Mr Tribe said on CNN.

That prediction, while confident by itself, helps to illustrate the overall air of uncertainty in the legal and political worlds surrounding the issue of whether Mr Trump will truly face any consequences for January 6 or not. It’s a broad departure from what lawmakers on Capitol Hill, including those on the January 6 committee like Adam Schiff, have said; Mr Schiff publicly fretted a week ago that he saw “no indication” the Justice Department was pursuing Mr Trump at all.

The agency has, meanwhile, charged hundreds of participants in the attack on Congress with various low-level offenses and sought varying degrees of punishment; a handful of far-right activists, including the leader of the Proud Boys, have been hit with more serious charges including seditious conspiracy.

The January 6 committee over the past several weeks has laid out a case for Mr Trump to potentially be charged with crimes such as seditious conspiracy, as the members have proved that the White House was well aware of the likelihood of mass violence breaking out on January 6 and went through with their efforts to overturn the election anyway. They have also shown how Mr Trump’s closest advisers, including family members like Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, were against the idea and did not support the claims of fraud being pushed by the president whose own attorney general had told him they were nonsense.

But the committee lacks the authority to issue criminal charges and thus must rely on the Justice Department and its typical refusal to publicly or privately confirm major developments regarding investigations before they occur.

One criminal investigation that is definitely ongoing and could soon turn into an indictment is the effort being pursued by prosecutors in Georgia, who have convened a grand jury to hear arguments that Mr Trump improperly pressured state officials in his effort to reverse his defeat to Joe Biden in that state.

The January 6 committee held a surprise hearing last week featuring explosive testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, an aide to chief of staff Mark Meadows in the Trump White House, and is set to have at least one more public hearing in the weeks ahead.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in