Trump impeachment: John Bolton’s testimony in doubt after key witness requests court ruling
Lawyer representing the witness may also seek ruling on whether the former national security adviser can testify
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A key witness in the Donald Trump impeachment investigation has filed a lawsuit asking a federal judge to rule on whether he can testify, a move that raises new doubts about whether the president's closest aides, like the former national security adviser John Bolton, will be able to cooperate with the inquiry.
House Democrats had subpoenaed the witness, Charles Kupperman, who served as Mr Trump’s deputy national security adviser, to testify on Monday. But in an effort to stop Mr Kupperman from doing so, the White House on Friday said the president had invoked “constitutional immunity,” leaving Mr Kupperman uncertain about what to do.
“Plaintiff obviously cannot satisfy the competing demands of both the legislative and executive branches, and he is aware of no controlling judicial authority definitively establishing which branch’s command should prevail,” the suit said.
The implications of the suit, filed in federal court in Washington, extend beyond Mr Kupperman. His lawyer, Charles Cooper, also represents Mr Bolton and is likely to address congressional requests for his testimony in a similar fashion. House Democrats have had discussions with Cooper in recent days about Bolton testifying but have not subpoenaed him.
Democrats believe Mr Kupperman and Mr Bolton could be significant witnesses for their investigation. Unlike several of the administration officials who have already testified, they were both close advisers of Trump, dealt directly with him on Ukraine policy and could testify about what Mr Trump said behind closed doors.
House Democrats are investigating whether Mr Trump withheld aid from Ukraine to pressure the country’s president to conduct investigations that could help him politically. After Mr Bolton resigned on 10 September, Mr Kupperman took over as the acting national security adviser. The next day, Mr Trump released the $391m (£305m) in aid that he had withheld.
“Constitutional immunity” is essentially executive privilege on steroids. Mr Kupperman said in the lawsuit that Mr Trump’s White House counsel, Pat Cipollone, had ordered him not to comply with the subpoena.
The president’s legal team apparently issued the same advice it had given other former top White House aides, like Mr Cipollone’s predecessor, Donald McGahn, who had been asked to testify before lawmakers in the spring.
Mr McGahn defied the subpoena, and in August, the House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit seeking an order requiring him to comply. That litigation is not yet resolved.
The New York Times
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments