Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump impeachment hearing: Witness hits out at 'vile character attacks' following president's tweets

Lt Col Alexander Vindman was on controversial July 25 phone call

Andrew Buncombe
Seattle
Tuesday 19 November 2019 05:55 EST
Comments
Trump impeachment hearing: Witness hits out at 'vile character attacks' following president's tweets

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A uniformed military officer has used the impeachment inquiry to denounce “vile character attacks” on other witnesses, following a Donald Trump Twitter rant.

Lt Col Alexander Vindman, director for European affairs at the national security council, who was on the president’s July 25 phone call with the leader of Ukraine, said it was “improper” for him to demand a foreign government investigate a US citizen and political opponent.

It was for that reason he raised his concerns about the president’s request to Volodymyr Zelensky.

“I never thought I would be sitting here testifying in front of this committee and the American public, about my actions. When I reported my concerns, my only thought was to act properly and to carry out duty,” Lt Col said on Tuesday.

He added: “I want to take a moment to recognise the courage of my colleagues who have appeared and are scheduled to appear before this committee.”

The officer also appeared to directly rebut an an attack Mr Trump made last Friday on social media against Marie Yovanovitch, a former US ambassador to Ukraine. He said everywhere she had served “went bad”.

“I want to state that the vile character attacks on these distinguished and honourable public servants is reprehensible,” said Lt Col Vindman.

“It is natural to disagree and engage in spirited debate, this has been our custom since the time of our Founding Fathers, but we are better than callow and cowardly attacks.”

Fox News hosts shout at each other in furious on-air row over Donald Trump impeachment

The testimony of the 44-year old officer, who told the committee he spoke Russian, Ukraine and a “little bit of English”, carries particular weight because was was among a handful of officials who listened directly as Mr Trump spoke to Mr Zelensky.

Republicans have denounced previous witnesses as having no direct knowledge and relying on “hearsay”.

“The uniform I wear today is that of the United States army. The members of our all volunteer force are made up of a patchwork of people from all ethnicities, religions, and socio-economic backgrounds who come together under a common oath to protect and defend the constitution of the United States of America,” said Lt Col Vindman.

“We do not serve any particular political party, we serve the nation. I am humbled to come before you today as one of many who serve in the most distinguished and able military in the world.”

Democrats launched a formal impeachment inquiry after a whistleblower alleged Mr Trump had improperly asked Mr Zelensky to launch an investigation into Joe Biden and his son, in exchange for the release of US military aide and a state visit to Washington.

Mr Trump has denied any wrongdoing and dismissed the proceedings as a “witch hunt”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in