Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump unleashes Truth Social rant as he wakes to historic first day of criminal hush money trial

Republican presidential candidate raged on social media before heading to a Manhattan courtroom for the start of his first criminal trial

Joe Sommerlad,Martha McHardy
Monday 15 April 2024 10:53 EDT
Comments
Trump falsely accuses Biden of ‘lawfare’ against him as hush money trial looms

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump lashed out on Truth Social on Monday morning as he prepared to make history by becoming the first current or former American president to ever face a criminal trial.

In a series of rants on his social media platform, the former president called for the New York hush money case against him to be dropped and once more claimed without evidence that the indictments he faces are part of a plot by “Radical Left Democrats” to prevent him from campaigning for the presidency.

“As virtually every legal scholar has powerfully stated, the Biden Manhattan Witch Hunt Case is, among other things, BARRED by the Statute of Limitations. This ‘trial’ should be ended by the highly conflicted presiding Judge,” the candidate claimed in a post.

In a follow-up post, he again blamed Democrats – and mistakenly claimed he was going to court for “bogus lawsuits” rather than a criminal trial on 34 felony counts.

“The Radical Left Democrats are already cheating on the 2024 Presidential Election by bringing, or helping to bring, all of these bogus lawsuits against me, thereby forcing me to sit in courthouses, and spend money that could be used for campaigning, instead of being out in the field knocking Crooked Joe Biden, the WORST President in the History of the United States. Election Interference!” he said.

After a third, less characteristic post in which he pointed to the absurdity of Russia calling for restraint from Israel in response to the drone attack from Iran it suffered over the weekend, Mr Trump returned to his own plight, asking: “Why didn’t they bring this totally discredited lawsuit 7 years ago??? Election Interference!”

In a fifth post, he bemoaned the gag order imposed on him by Judge Juan Merchan, which came after several online attacks on the judge, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and even the justice’s own daughter.

“I want my VOICE back. This Crooked Judge has GAGGED me. Unconstitutional! The other side can talk about me, but I am not allowed to talk about them! Rigged Trial!” he vented.

The series of rants came just hours before the Republican presumptive presidential nominee headed to court for the start of his first criminal trial.

DA Bragg charged the former president with 34 felony counts relating to the falsification of business records in order to conceal a “hush money” payment made to the porn star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential election, to ensure her silence over an extramarital affair she alleges they had a decade earlier.

Mr Trump denies the affair and any wrongdoing in the case. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

His early morning Truth Social rants were actually picking up where he had left off on Sunday evening.

“Just four years ago I was a very popular and successful President of the United States, getting more votes than any sitting President in history,” he lamented on the eve of the trial.

Former US President Donald Trump attends the first day of his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments
Former US President Donald Trump attends the first day of his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments (POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

“Tomorrow morning I’ll be in Criminal Court, before a totally conflicted Judge, a Corrupt Prosecutor, a Legal System in CHAOS, a State being overrun by violent crime and corruption, and Crooked Joe Biden’s henchmen ‘Rigging the System’ against his Political Opponent, ME!

“I will be fighting for myself but, much more importantly, I will be fighting for our Country,” he added, before baselessly accusing Mr Bragg of “election interference.”

Lawyers for the prosecution in the hush money case are expected to allege that Mr Trump paid the money to Ms Daniels in order to stop her coming forward with her story in October 2016 – a story that could have discredited him in the eyes of voters as he ran for the White House.

Ms Daniels, former Playboy model Karen McDougal, Mr Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen, National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, ex-campaign aide Hope Hicks and perhaps even Mr Trump himself could all appear as witnesses in what promises to be a sensational multi-week trial in Manhattan.

The proceedings got under way on Monday morning after Judge Merchan batted away numerous last-ditch attempts by the defendant’s lawyers to have the case thrown out or delayed. Jury selection, the first order of business in the case, could last one to two weeks.

Should Mr Trump ultimately be found guilty, he could theoretically face more than a decade in prison.

The maximum sentence for each felony count against him is four years in prison, which would add up to 136 years behind bars, but New York imposes a 20-year sentencing cap for this type of offence, with a decision on whether the sentences run concurrently or consecutively left up to the judge.

Given that Mr Trump also has no prior criminal record and the crimes of which he stands accused are non-violent in nature, the judge could ultimately incline towards leniency and only sentence him to a fraction of the maximum jail time allowed or simply choose to place him on probation.

Mr Trump’s legal team have also attempted to argue that “presidential immunity” shields his “official acts” from prosecution but have so far failed to convince the judge, although the matter is set to be considered by the US Supreme Court later this month.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in