Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump ‘wants’ Glock pistol he can’t legally purchase during South Carolina gun store visit

Federal statutes prohibit anyone under federal indictment from purchasing a firearm

Alex Woodward
Tuesday 26 September 2023 06:10 EDT
Comments
Donald Trump tours gun shop in South Carolina

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump, who is facing two separate federal indictments and dozens of criminal charges in four states, posed with a handgun with his face engraved on the grip during a tour of a gun store in South Carolina.

A social media post from a spokesperson for the former president said he bought the weapon, then clarified that he only wanted to, then deleted the post with a video of the exchange, in which Mr Trump can be heard telling the seller “I want to buy one” as he points to a bronze-coloured Glock pistol.

The clip was preserved by a social media account for the National Rifle Association, with a post stating that the leading candidate for the 2024 Republican nomination for president “falls in love with a Trump edition gun”.

Mr Trump posed with the gun alongside South Carolina’s Republican Attorney General Alan Wilson before a campaign rally.

Federal statutes prohibit firearm sales to any person who is under felony indictment, and lying on a transaction form to determine eligibility could also include additional criminal charges.

Mr Trump, who faces 91 criminal charges, and who famously told supporters in 2016 that he could “stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody” without losing voters, has vowed to protect and expand Second Amendment protections if elected, joining Republican candidates for the GOP’s nomination who have rejected the role of high-powered weapons and proliferation of firearms in the gun violence crisis.

The former president also has welcomed charges against President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden stemming from a gun purchase in 2018 – charges that involve lying on a federal firearm transaction form.

Last year, Trump-appointed federal judge David Counts argued that federal law prohibiting people under felony indictments from purchasing firearms is unconstitutional, a decision citing the US Supreme Court’s 2022 opinion that gun reform advocates have warned could radically reshape or upend protections against gun violence.

The decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v Bruen argues that any firearms restriction must “demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition,” a decision hailed as a major achievement among gun lobbyists but one that raises the bar for state and federal laws to be able to respond to a modern gun violence crisis.

A wave of legal challenges supported by group groups followed the Bruen decision to challenge the constitutionality of such restrictions, including those taking aim at transaction forms.

Last week, the Biden administration launched the first-ever White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention to implement the president’s executive actions on gun reform alongside state and local governments, and to deploy a FEMA-like response in the wake of mass acts of violence and to communities acutely impacted by gun violence.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in