Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Former Trump attorneys are now steering clear of him, partly because he fails to pay, report claims

List includes William Burk, who represented Trump figures in the Russia investigation

Gino Spocchia
Thursday 14 October 2021 07:49 EDT
Comments
US Marshals could go after Trump aides, Capitol riot committee member says

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A number of attorneys who formerly defended Donald Trump and his personal aides have allegedly turned down recent requests from the former president.

A source told CNN in an article published on Wednesday that Mr Trump had reached out to four former attorneys for help in recent weeks, but could not recruit them.

Among the figures are William Burk, who worked for Mr Trump’s aides during the Russia investigation. He also represented Steve Bannon, a former White House aide.

It was reported that Mr Burk had been turned off by how “toxic” Mr Trump’s situation had become post-presidency, while a number of others alleged that there was a reputation of lawyers not being properly paid.

It comes as a number of Mr Trump’s former associates face subpoenas from a House select committee investigating January’s Capitol riot – and which Mr Trump has dubbed “harassment subpoenas”.

The former president instructed the four to refuse to comply with the subpoenas, setting up a possible legal battle and US marshals being tasked with forcing the likes of Mr Bannon to appear, a member of the committee warned on Wednesday.

In addition to Mr Bannon, the aides with subpoenas are Mr Trump’s former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, a deputy chief of staff, Dan Scavino, and Kash Patel, a former official in the department of defence.

A fifth individual and former defence lawyer department lawyer, Jeffrey Clark, was issued with a subpoena by the committee on Wednesday.

In a statement to CNN, the former president’s office did not accept that he had asked Mr Burck to represent him, and went as far as saying that he did not know who he was.

“I don't even know who they are, they are just looking to get publicity,” he allegedly said. “I am using lawyers who have been with us from the beginning.”

“I do pay my lawyers when they do a good job,” Mr Trump added.

Mr Trump was reportedly considering using executive privilege to fight subpoenas for documents and records related to 6 January, although the White House has so far refused to allow it.

The Independent has approached the former president for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in