Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump will not declassify Democrats' memo rebutting claims of FBI abuse

Shortly after the President released Republicans' classified memo despite similar warnings about security implications

Jeremy B. White
San Francisco
Friday 09 February 2018 21:35 EST
Comments
Adam Schiff speaks to the media after a closed-door meeting of the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill
Adam Schiff speaks to the media after a closed-door meeting of the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump will not “at this time” authorise release of a Democrat-authored memo that seeks to rebut Republican claims of abuse and anti-Trump bias at the Justice Department and the FBI.

In a letter to the House Intelligence Committee, White House Counsel Donald McGahn said Mr Trump was “inclined” to declassify the document, but he could not because of “numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages”. Mr McGahn wrote that the President would consider releasing a revised version.

Earlier in the day, Mr Trump told reporters that the Democrats' memo was going to be released “soon”.

The document in question emerged out of a protracted dispute over another memorandum, compiled by Republicans on the intelligence panel, which questioned the “legitimacy and legality” of the FBI and the Justice Department’s application to surveil former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

In that case, Mr Trump overruled warnings about the consequences of exposing sensitive information.

After Republicans voted to declassify the memo, Mr Trump moved to make it public despite a senior justice department attorney warning that doing so would be “extraordinarily reckless” and the FBI releasing a rare statement highlighting its “grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy”.

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee called out those divergent responses.

“After ignoring urging of FBI & DOJ not to release misleading Nunes memo because it omits material facts, @POTUS now expresses concerns over sharing precisely those facts with public and seeks to send it back to the same Majority that produced the flawed Nunes memo to begin with,” California Democrat Adam Nunes said on Twitter.

Mr Trump has trumpeted the Republican memo as evidence of abuse that corroborates his frequent accusations that a probe of potential linkages between his presidential campaign and the Russian government is unfounded and compromised by a partisan agenda.

Donald Trump overheard saying he will '100 per cent' release FBI memo

But Democrats have assailed the memo as an incomplete accounting that omits key information in an effort to distract from the Russia investigation. They argue their memo in response provides the full picture.

“We think this will help inform the public of the many distortions and inaccuracies in the majority memo,” Rep Adam Schiff of California, Mr Nunes said after the panel voted to release the Democrats' memo.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in